Nah, then your opinion would simply change. You are currently being vocal about something you have no proof of. DOJ prosecuting trump for crimes isn't evidence of the DOJ being weaponized.
Yes it is, and no it isn't. The DOJ is supposed to investigate crimes, gather evidence, and prosecute the party the evidence shows committed the crime. You are 100% on point when you characterized this as "the DOJ going after Trump". It is a corruption of the system for the system to go after anyone, for the focus to be on the person to find something in the legal code they can use. to prosecute.
Apologies are never accepted. I did clarify my remarks multiple times and it made no difference. I got banned. I deserved it. I'm going to do my best going forward to stay out of personally directed comments.
Not at all. That was their job. They did their job. I do think many defendant's rights to a speedy trial were violated, but on the whole I have no quarrel with the prosecutions of those criminals and believe it to have been a far better way to handle it than to have had the military come in to start putting down protesters using lethal force.
Wait, if you know about these secret plea deals hidden in diversion agreements then how exactly are they secret?
I do not see the relevance of this.
Because the judge in the case caught the unusual language, which she believed was unconstitutional, and directly asked the prosecution on the record what they were doing. The prosecution immediately retreated from the secret deal at which point Hunter Biden's lawyers said they were ripping up the deal to help the prosecutors to not be publicly embarrassed. If not for that judge, no one would have known how they did it, only that Hunter Biden would have escaped with probation for a set of crimes that would land anyone else in prison for decades and gained almost total immunity for any crime that may have been committed in that period of time.
My opinion, and the judges, and much of the media biased left, right, and center.
www.nbcnews.com
At the risk of getting banned again, I do not equate your situation to the situation of those who are not you. I do think a parent's job is to imbue life skills into their kids. I am doing my best to do that with my own kid and I recognize that you have done that as well. I do think you have done a good job as a parent. While I never said that you had engaged in the types of behaviors that were the subject of the film being discussed, I can see how my words could have been interpreted in a way that could imply as such. For that, I apologize to you for any hurt that caused.
Ya this is of course how you see it. I listened to a legal expert on ksl 1160 radio who said that the hunter plea deal would have been accepted if not for political bias. That a plea deal like the one he had set up is typical. What was atypical was the fact that the judge didn't accept the plea deal. Because the justice system is being weaponized against kids of prominent democrats of course. Thats the only explanation.Because the judge in the case caught the unusual language, which she believed was unconstitutional, and directly asked the prosecution on the record what they were doing. The prosecution immediately retreated from the secret deal at which point Hunter Biden's lawyers said they were ripping up the deal to help the prosecutors to not be publicly embarrassed. If not for that judge, no one would have known how they did it, only that Hunter Biden would have escaped with probation for a set of crimes that would land anyone else in prison for decades and gained almost total immunity for any crime that may have been committed in that period of time.
My opinion, and the judges, and much of the media biased left, right, and center.
But you are in good company wanting to see the evidence. This bit of corruption was so obvious that now oversight committees are preparing to send out subpoenas.
House Republicans demand answers from DOJ on Hunter Biden plea agreement
A letter signed by three committee chairmen called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to answer their questions about the derailed plea deal by Aug. 14.
It was immediately after the Hunter Biden plea deal fell apart that Trump's new charges along with Hunter Biden's former coworker being named as the judge to oversee Trump's prosecution happened. It is a game of DOJ corruption to misdirect from other DOJ corruption.
You were listening to a democrat shill. The deal wasn't rejected. Hunter Biden's legal team withdrew from it. Do you honestly believe Hunter Biden's own lawyers are politically biased against Hunter?
Nope the judge rejected the plea deal. The person I was listening to is part of MAGA. The DOJ is rigged against democrats.
That is wrong. At least listen to your own sources. The judge did not reject the plea deal.
That prompted Chris Clark, an attorney for Biden, to say: "As far as I'm concerned, the plea agreement is null and void" -- stirring the courtroom into audible gasps.
'Rip it up': Inside the dramatic unraveling of Hunter Biden's plea deal
For the better part of three hours, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika scrutinized nearly every facet of the plea deal -- prompting shrugs, audible exhales and frantic glances.abc7ny.com
