I was randomly comparing Paulo and Scottie to Flagg last night and realized that they were both a year older than Flagg during their freshman season. I find that the age thing is often used as an excuse for someone who plays really bad, but Flagg is on par with elite prospects and is also young. The difference in those early years can make a huge difference.
It doesn’t happen as often in NCAA, basketball, but look at International prospects who play in the same league from 18-19. The jump is not guaranteed, but they are often massive. Perhaps this is more pronounced in a league full of men vs older kids, but I think you get the idea.
I think Flagg would be #1 if he was a year older, but it’s interesting to think about just how good he’d be a year later.