Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Your standards..
I prefer tall people who aren't stuck on themselves.
Your standards..
You and I obviously have some very different valuations of players, and that's fine.
Our positions on DeRozan and Gay are so far apart that I'm not certain we could ever agree on some of these.
The way you write you remind me a lot of a friend who's so stubborn he can't admit being wrong.
I think if you asked Kicky, he would openly admit that this is one of his personal faults. I don't believe you're the only one that feels this way about Kicky. Sometimes, we as individuals must have a personal catalyst in life in order to deal with our foibles.
I have my flaws as well. Was just something I thought to notice in his style of discussing.
I think by end of the next season a lot of people will listen how I evaluate players.
The way you write you remind me a lot of a friend who's so stubborn he can't admit being wrong. You don't do that openly, but the best I have read from you was "let's say we don't agree" when clearly wrong. Not speaking about this situation but generally.
I believe you when you say you follow basketball generally and you can obviously read stats. Not sure it's lack of interpretation skills or desire to have the last word in a conversation at all times but it's very inconsistent to refer to advanced stats and then switch over to such a superficial stat as FG%.
I, for one, think BTP is vastly underrated on this board. I'm being 100% serious.
He's one of the best, actually.
I was more interested in the overall outcomes of large contracts rather than about trying to get into specific arguments regarding individual players. And yes, I like everyone else believe i'm right more often than is probably accurate. That said, this is a subject for which "right" isn't objective because there is no basketball god who can imprint the exact right contract number on a player's forehead.
To be honest the biggest reason I didn't go point by point with you is because you put your responses in a quote box and that made it harder for me to quote back, so I just took from it what I got from it. I spent a lot of time in the Bay Area watching Monta Ellis nearly nightly and have extreme difficulty buying into any viewpoint that he should even make $5 million annually much less that he's a bargain at a significant premium over that number.
Different arguments call for different things. If we want to have a conversation about Demar Derozan's defense that's something that requires an advanced look because things look superficially great in one-on-one matchups. If we want to ask the question, "Is Andres Biedrins a good free throw shooter" there isn't a lot of surface that needs scratching. Advanced stats are most useful (in my mind) when they can show you things that aren't necessarily intuitive. Their useful diagnostically when they confirm things that you already know, but the added complexity of going down that path isn't as useful in conversation.
I, for one, think BTP is vastly underrated on this board. I'm being 100% serious.
He's one of the best, actually.
I, for one, think BTP is vastly underrated on this board. I'm being 100% serious.
He's one of the best, actually.
*confirmed*
I have said so many times myself.
keeper sin?
What did I miss?