Weezur
Well-Known Member
TO's and FT's killed us tonight.
We lost the rebounding battle 45 to 44.
That shouldn't happen very often.
TO's and FT's killed us tonight.
Hayward was absolutely horrific tonight. I know it's only one night and all players have off nights, but those two shots that clanked were inexcusable. I said in another post, when I returned to the forum, that I was not sold on either Favors or Hayward. Favors endeared himself to me tonight and Hayward made me think he needs to stick to playing online role playing games.
Facepalm man! OKC is not a contender without Westbrook. They have never contended without Westbrook. Westbrook is not just a good player. Westbrook is a great player. He is a top-10 NBA player. He is instrumental in what OKC hopes to do in their game plans, in the structure of their team, and in any hopes they have at making it anywhere in the playoffs. Are you kidding (trolling) me? Are you so desperate for silver linings that you're willing to either completely downplay and distort the truth or delude yourself into thinking this way? I don't know why it bugs me so much, other than the fact that is just seems so... dishonest
Edit: I'm not saying it's not cool that we played as close as we did. But why do we have to lie about the quality of team we were playing? Are we so desperate for good feelings and what not. Is it not enough to say we played a decent playoff quality team close? Why must we embellish
He had some good steals and passes at the end of the game. You can't always look at his shots. But I agree, he could've been better.
Hayward was absolutely horrific tonight. I know it's only one night and all players have off nights, but those two shots that clanked were inexcusable. I said in another post, when I returned to the forum, that I was not sold on either Favors or Hayward. Favors endeared himself to me tonight and Hayward made me think he needs to stick to playing online role playing games.
Favors had 5 assists tonight...just outstanding.
That man has really worked on improving his overall game. Nice to see.
The Jazz are missing a third of their personnel, have another third who never played with the others before, and one last third without any starter experience. But yeah, OKC didn't have a guy.
Where do you get good high res pics of media day, etc to make wallpapers with?
So it is OK for you to embellish. Westbrook is not a top 10 player. He is a great player but he isn't in the top 10. Besides do we know if he will be the same player? There are times when Westbrook gets selfish which has cost the Thunder a few games. Even without Westbrook, OKC is a very good team and the Jazz have been predicted to be a bottom 5 team, so maybe just a little embellishment should be tolerated.
I agree that if Westbrook had played in the game the score would not have been as close but you have to give credit to the Jazz for fighting hard and coming back.
hayward 28 mins
12 pts 5 ast 3 stl 4 rbd
Favors 43 mins
15 pts 5 ast 2 bl 9 rbd
I know stats don't tell the whole story but it seems weird that you seem to want to throw him under the bus.
People miss shots bro it happens and it is totally excusable.
hayward 28 mins
12 pts 5 ast 3 stl 4 rbd
Favors 43 mins
15 pts 5 ast 2 bl 9 rbd
I know stats don't tell the whole story but it seems weird that you seem to want to throw him under the bus.
People miss shots bro it happens and it is totally excusable.
Though Hayward was 4/13 which is quite terrible.
No it's not.For a sg .40 fg% is great.