What's new
By:
Filters

2020 Presidential election

DasJazz said:
View attachment 7843
Click to expand...

You understand that the map I provided showed how the national election would be if based on Trump’s approval rating, right? It could be a starter for a discussion. If states where trump has poor approval rating vote D, he could be in trouble. Will they vote D or will they bite the bullet and vote for a man who they disapprove? What could Dems/repubs to win over these voters? It’s a starter to a discussion.

What insight was your map supposed to provide?
 
tumblr_inline_ozialpWWYK1titagt_500.png
 
This is clearly bad optics for Donald Trump. I fully expect the liberal media to write editorial after editorial about what republicans are doing to salvage the African American vote. Many people of color just find republican positions and rhetoric to just be too extreme. Very bad optics for Donald trump this morning.

 
The Thriller said:
This is clearly bad optics for Donald Trump. I fully expect the liberal media to write editorial after editorial about what republicans are doing to salvage the African American vote. Many people of color just find republican positions and rhetoric to just be too extreme. Very bad optics for Donald trump this morning.

Click to expand...

This is how Trump "loves" America.
 
jazzrule said:
tumblr_inline_ozialpWWYK1titagt_500.png
Click to expand...
That map at least somewhat realistic, though I'd be shocked to see him sweet Pennsylvania/Michigan/Wisconsin again, especially Michigan. It's not like he's got more popular there, and he won the state by like 20,000 votes or something in 2016. Him winning Minnesota would be shocking too, as well as the Northeast states other than the Maine 2nd CD. Then again it depends on the Democratic candidate. Perhaps the Dems do nominate someone as bad as Hillary this time around, even though it's hard to imagine.

He has the economy going for him, but I've never seen a guy blow such an advantage by being such an unlikable jackass. Any time there's good economic news he shoots himself in the foot with some dumb controversy that he invents himself.
 


Referring to people of different races and religions as “vermin” who “infest” areas to make them worse has precipitated every authoritarian regime of the past 100 years. Consequently, every genocide too. It’s interesting that rhetoric previously used by Nazis, communists in North Korea, Khmer Rouge, Hutus against Tutsis, and currently against the Rohingya is used so repeatedly by this administration.

I’m sure Trumpers will find a way to justify this.

But students of history know where this is headed. You’ve been warned.
 
The Thriller said:


Referring to people of different races and religions as “vermin” who “infest” areas to make them worse has precipitated every authoritarian regime of the past 100 years. Consequently, every genocide too. It’s interesting that rhetoric previously used by Nazis, communists in North Korea, Khmer Rouge, Hutus against Tutsis, and currently against the Rohingya is used so repeatedly by this administration.

I’m sure Trumpers will find a way to justify this.

But students of history know where this is headed. You’ve been warned.
Click to expand...
Tweeted over 43,000 times lol

I haven't even tweeted once. I'm happy about that.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
The Thriller said:


Referring to people of different races and religions as “vermin” who “infest” areas to make them worse has precipitated every authoritarian regime of the past 100 years. Consequently, every genocide too. It’s interesting that rhetoric previously used by Nazis, communists in North Korea, Khmer Rouge, Hutus against Tutsis, and currently against the Rohingya is used so repeatedly by this administration.

I’m sure Trumpers will find a way to justify this.

But students of history know where this is headed. You’ve been warned.
Click to expand...


I think if genocide began happening, Trumpers would find a way to justify that too. I don't think there is any amount of anything that Trump would do that wouldn't be justified by his followers and then blamed on Democrats for "starting it". Trump was definitely right, he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and not lose voters. I just wonder how he knew that.
 
Nate505 said:
That map at least somewhat realistic, though I'd be shocked to see him sweet Pennsylvania/Michigan/Wisconsin again, especially Michigan. It's not like he's got more popular there, and he won the state by like 20,000 votes or something in 2016. Him winning Minnesota would be shocking too, as well as the Northeast states other than the Maine 2nd CD. Then again it depends on the Democratic candidate. Perhaps the Dems do nominate someone as bad as Hillary this time around, even though it's hard to imagine.

He has the economy going for him, but I've never seen a guy blow such an advantage by being such an unlikable jackass. Any time there's good economic news he shoots himself in the foot with some dumb controversy that he invents himself.
Click to expand...

You kinda have to wait to see who Trump is running against. He's not running in a vacuum.
 
str8line said:
Between golf, watching Fox, twittering and painting himself orange it's incredible he makes so much time to pay attention to his son and wife.
Click to expand...

If all he did was sit on his *** watching tv without tweeting and played golf without his racist rallies, his re-election chances would skyrocket.
 
NPC D4617 said:
LMAO

Says the guy who is consistently the tweeting the most on Jazzfanz.
Click to expand...
You are confused again. Typical. I will explain it to you. I don't have a Twitter account and have never tweeted.

I do however post on jazzfanz a lot.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top