Search results

That it won't get you very far. False hope, fools gold, whatever you want to call it while you pay nearly 40 mil a year for it.

Games like this are going to happen when your leading scorrer is highly inefficient. GSW learned with Monta, every team Carmello was on learned. Utah will learn.

Best rimmer runner in the game!

You mean Obama or the soon to be?

Apologies if quoting twice is annoying. How much do you think willingness will improve after time to test properly? I think the biggest obstacle right now, by far, is how quickly theyre trying to come to market.

We can expect this kind of sentiment with politicized issues. Democrats, for example, have significantly increased willingness after the presidential vote. Hell, VP elect Kamala Harris was the queen of the anti-vaxxers right here in the SLC debate, pushing nonsense that drove anti-vax...

That's crazy. Most of them probably live in geographic pools. I bet most of them will get the vaccine after everyone else does and it's shown safe. Either that or theyll quickly achieve herd immunity the old fashioned way.

Posters here have a bizarrely high rate of running into anti-vaxxers. There cant be more than three four hundred of them and you find them all. I don't get the oversized concern with a few moonbats. They make life interesting.

It could be as simple as that. His pride doesn't allow for failure, so I'm a winner needs some cognitive dissonance. Apparently voter fraud gives him that.

Trying to come up with what benefit Trump thinks he'll gain personally from this and that's the only one I can. Who knows why he thinks it's good for him. I'm sure many of you think he's dumb enough to think he honestly believes he can win in court but I don't. This is a dumb sideshow, and...

That's why I subscribe to a vote opposite theory of politics.

Both good posts that seem to contradict each other's claims. Wonder which is more accurate?

Nearly $40 million per for a highly inefficient player. Jazz just strapped themselves in to Air Mediocrity.

That's great! This is the kind of thing that's useful to bring up in conversation. I've been a bit down recently in many conversations where good people believe there has been massive fraud. I don't respond with much because it would start a no good fight or at minimum relationship...

Ok thanks. Do you know how they did a full recount? Was it by hand or some other way? I'm guessing not by hand counting actual ballots cuz that wouldn't make sense since they were cast on maxhines right? So how do you do a "full recount" in the first place?

Not sure how this tangent directly ties to the articke I linked, but do you have any proof that AZ did a full recount?

Here is another interesting one. Any of this true? https://freepressers.com/articles/who-are-the-stakeholders-in-dominion-voting-systems

https://gnews.org/560854/ Anyone know if there is any truth to this Staple Street Capital stuff? Wasn't shriller in love with Carlyle group back in the Bush II neocon Blackwater days?

Haha ok. You get strung out on some wierd **** mate.

That's worth looking into. FWIW, I checked Heritage Foundation's voter fraud database going back to 2009 and found only democrats in Pennsylvania. No republicans were specifically listed. I assume the ACORN bloke was a D too, but could be wrong maybe he's the only R ACORN dude in the country.