I don’t really care… because the environment he functioned in is more likely the environment I would have him in. I think it’s just as fair to worry about how a guy would fair when he isn’t getting every possible rep.
I don't disagree about his role....but I can't really place him in the top 5 range like others unless he was showing signs of being a super high volume shooter. Who knows, he could be like Booker where the team is holding him back. But I have a hard time moving him up from where I have him (I think I have him at 9 or 10) without knowing how he does in a bigger role and/or truly separated himself as a shooter. I have no problems if someone said he is the best shooter in the draft but I think others are similar or have a claim themselves. There's a good chance the decision is going to be between some combination of Black/Wallace/Dick/Hendricks. I think I would take Black/Wallace there knowing you can probably get one of Whitehead/Brice/Hawkins/Howard later on.