Can we trade NAOS for a Clutchfan and a Foreigner-who's-a-fan-of-his/her-countryman to be named later?
Or is that not equivalent value?
Salaries must match. NAOS makes north of 100k iirc
Can we trade NAOS for a Clutchfan and a Foreigner-who's-a-fan-of-his/her-countryman to be named later?
Or is that not equivalent value?
Can we trade NAOS for a Clutchfan and a Foreigner-who's-a-fan-of-his/her-countryman to be named later?
Or is that not equivalent value?
Yeah, yeah. Sure. I am tired of repeating all the same things all over again. See my posting from here.
Picking the "27" minutes but without looking closely, is the problem. This year he was benched so often and Snyder made his rotations, even he was on fire. But hold back when others were on fire.
And This is his 4th year. I talked about the 3 years before. If these years weren't wasted, now in his 4th year we wouldn't talk about his sucking in defensive game. He didn't want to concentrate on defense?
After season 1 or 2 he was ripped like Ibaka but yet nobody cared (he was in this sports center for bulking up).
Did you expect a guy who hadn't played in a year to get 30 mins/per as a rookie? He got 13, which is the same Gobert got his rookie season (except Rudy got a lot of DNP-CD's). Kanter played in all 66 games (it was the strike-shortened season). Next season I concede he should have played 20+ instead of 15/per. But don't tell me he didn't benefit a TON by working on his moves with Big Al. Year 3: Jazz make the HUGE commitment to Enes by letting Big Al go. Enes repays them by SUCKING on defense. He's SO bad they move him to the 2nd unit...but still have him getting his normal minutes (27/per). Late in the season he's again starting. This year they stick by him AGAIN. He was NOT benched so often. Snyder had him starting. Sure, there were some times Gobert might go in for defense. But there were times Rudy was then pulled out and Kanter put back in for offense.
And being ripped? What in the hell does that have to do with basketball? You have to be in shape, yes. But more muscle mass does not automatically make you a better player. Kanter had a ton of chances to shine. His desire to NOT play defensively was what held him back. Look, Favors had the SAME coaches. Why did he not SUCK at defense if it is the coaches' fault? Derrick manned up and put forth the effort. Kanter was all about offense. Any excuses he or Ergul makes is just B.S. What it comes down to is he was beaten out by a HUNGRIER player. One who was concerned with how he could make the TEAM better, not just pad his stats.

Kanter teh victim.
That's the reason why he got shredded? You have personal contact with this fool?
Why NAOS? He's making sense in this thread.
Did you expect a guy who hadn't played in a year to get 30 mins/per as a rookie? He got 13, which is the same Gobert got his rookie season (except Rudy got a lot of DNP-CD's). Kanter played in all 66 games (it was the strike-shortened season). Next season I concede he should have played 20+ instead of 15/per. But don't tell me he didn't benefit a TON by working on his moves with Big Al. Year 3: Jazz make the HUGE commitment to Enes by letting Big Al go. Enes repays them by SUCKING on defense. He's SO bad they move him to the 2nd unit...but still have him getting his normal minutes (27/per). Late in the season he's again starting. This year they stick by him AGAIN. He was NOT benched so often. Snyder had him starting. Sure, there were some times Gobert might go in for defense. But there were times Rudy was then pulled out and Kanter put back in for offense.
And being ripped? What in the hell does that have to do with basketball? You have to be in shape, yes. But more muscle mass does not automatically make you a better player. Kanter had a ton of chances to shine. His desire to NOT play defensively was what held him back. Look, Favors had the SAME coaches. Why did he not SUCK at defense if it is the coaches' fault? Derrick manned up and put forth the effort. Kanter was all about offense. Any excuses he or Ergul makes is just B.S. What it comes down to is he was beaten out by a HUNGRIER player. One who was concerned with how he could make the TEAM better, not just pad his stats.
Key word there was "NAOS."
Look, Kanter is gone, right? Why did I register? Because now I wanted to participate in this community. No more Kanter, no more "you homer" messages. But these kind of messages from above make me realize how fu**ed up Jazz fans are and it makes me leave this place. You behave like little children and are very rude. You keep insulting people and say things like Cancer.
I don't root for any team in the NBA, but I like some. Jazz is one of them. But slowly because of this fanbase, I think I have to rethink it.
oh heyyy zoob, what's going on?
Next Year? If the decision was Kanter vs Favors then Kanter was doomed from the start. Favors is simply better. Better (by a lot) on defense, even on offense.It took too much time for the Jazz to realise that Kanter and Favors can not play together. Favors defense is quite good but not good enough to camouflage Kanter's defensive limitations. It was obvious that Gobert would have been the Jazz future center....Jazz have chosen Favors over Kanter. Next season will be indicative to judge if the Jazz made the right choice.