I'm not sure PER is a relevant statistic to impact on a winning lineup. Royce is actually a better defend on wings than he is on guards, so I'm not sure how his size is hurting him, especially given his historically good rebounding rates.So you think his PER is lying? Royce's defense and lack of size at the 3/4 makes up for his limited offense? Royce is starting material? He is a good ball handler and passer? What exactly do you disagree with?
With two small (for NBA standards) players in Conley and Mitchell, w3 need more size in the starting lineup. 6'4" Royce at the 3/3 exacerbates the issue.
Royce’s 6’4” plays bigger and faster than whatever Joe’s measurements are.So you think his PER is lying? Royce's defense and lack of size at the 3/4 makes up for his limited offense? Royce is starting material? He is a good ball handler and passer? What exactly do you disagree with?
With two small (for NBA standards) players in Conley and Mitchell, w3 need more size in the starting lineup. 6'4" Royce at the 3/3 exacerbates the issue.
Royce is 317 in Player Impact Rating, -1.7 on D, and a 9 net differential (in a starting lineup).I'm not sure PER is a relevant statistic to impact on a winning lineup. Royce is actually a better defend on wings than he is on guards, so I'm not sure how his size is hurting him, especially given his historically good rebounding rates.
Faster I will agree with. Bigger, I disagree. Joe can actually hold off bigger sfs and pfs in the post (comparatively). I agree Royce plays bigger than his size.Royce’s 6’4” plays bigger and faster than whatever Joe’s measurements are.
I think there are several stats that are eye-raising. I’m not overreacting to any one of them. I’m more focused on the full product I see on the court.
I’d be fine with starting Joe. I think that’s clear, right?
Every possession is kind of extreme. What are the odds that using that challenge will be the difference between a win and a loss? What are the odds that putting up a shot with 2.4 seconds on the clock before the half, rather than just dribbling out the clock, will matter? Why close out a quarter strong when there’s a full 12 minutes left and you’ll get the first possession? If you’re that bad that you need to worry so much about every possession, then you’re not the team with the #1 offensive rating. It’s our advanced, amalgamated metrics that are going to carry us to a title, not our passion or “valuing possessions.” There are no blind spots to being a #1 offense.Steve Kerr just made a defensive substitution for the last 3 seconds of the 1st quarter. He did it in a flash and the players popped off the bench.
Everyone is responsible for creating a culture of valuing every possession.
Just thought I’d put this factoid in this thread.