What's new
By:

Brooklyn, Milwaukee & Denver interested in Millsap

I want to take a chance on trading for both Bargnani and Rondo. I think it is feasible. I know people dont like them both for various reasons but I like Bargs playing next too both Kanter and Favors and he opens the floor up. Bargs could start or come off the bench. Rondo will make this team better he just seems like a good fit here right now. I like his attitude and demeanor on the court.
 
Does no one around here have any interest in Larry Sanders? A Sanders/Favors/Kanter rotation would be amazing.
 
Revolution 9 said:
Jennings takes us nowhere, wouldnt fit in personaity wise, and would block Burks even more.

Great! Sign me up!
Click to expand...

Personality wise? What does that even mean? Because he is black and has a lot of tats? He and Hayward are both gaming nerds apparently (they both did something for COD together), so they seem to have similar hobbies at least.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Jennings has always been on a bad team, and has always been on extremely offensively limited teams. Give him some talent who can also score, and maybe he would become less selfish. I think it's a risk that can be made with little consequence. It doesn't work out, don't re-sign him.
Click to expand...

I don't often agree with Cy, but I agree with this.

Jennings was a much better player when he was playing off Bogut. Earlier in his career he was quoted as saying he loves passing it down low for Bogut to go to work. With the bigs that we have - he can do that. Then he can focus more on hitting the occasional 3's and driving to the basket to get AND 1's.

If we can get him by trading Millsap then that's a pretty good deal IMO. Provided that we can extend him at the market rate then there's nothing to lose.
 
I kind of agree. I'm a little wary of trading for a guy like Jennings, but I also firmly believe he would only cost around 7-8 million a year to extend and he could be a real bargain at that price.
 
trade sapman for whatver the best u can get bros. he's gonna leave for nothing in a few months anyway. no need to re-sign him. KOC be ware.
 
I'm against trading Millsap because it more or less guarantees the return of Al next year. If we resign Al then he's our starting center for the next 4 years. Say no to trading Paul.

I also don't understand the enamoration with Jennings. Is it because he scores lots of points? Most of the time he's shooting sub-40%. Sounds promising.
 
infection said:
I'm against trading Millsap because it more or less guarantees the return of Al next year. If we resign Al then he's our starting center for the next 4 years. Say no to trading Paul.

I also don't understand the enamoration with Jennings. Is it because he scores lots of points? Most of the time he's shooting sub-40%. Sounds promising.
Click to expand...

We're not saying he's the best or the greatest.

Obviously the list of available PG that we can realistically trade for or sign through FA is pretty slim. Rondo or Bledsoe would be our best option followed by the young PG Harrion coming up in the '14 draft.

However, if we can't get those guys, then obviously we have to look at other options and all we're saying is Jennings could be one of those options, along with picking up a PG in the '13 draft which is not a great crop by any stretch of the imagination.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
We're not saying he's the best or the greatest.

Obviously the list of available PG that we can realistically trade for or sign through FA is pretty slim. Rondo or Bledsoe would be our best option followed by the young PG Harrion coming up in the '14 draft.

However, if we can't get those guys, then obviously we have to look at other options and all we're saying is Jennings could be one of those options, along with picking up a PG in the '13 draft which is not a great crop by any stretch of the imagination.
Click to expand...

If that's the case then why not just retain Williams? I think going out and getting a bad option just because we 'need a PG' is a lot like holding on to Al because 'we need an offensive anchor' or dating someone because 'I need a girlfriend'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top