Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
So that makes what she said disingenuous?I know they have food stamps in Texas, like everywhere else. I know human nature is to raise the stakes when making an emotional argument.
So that makes what she said disingenuous?I know they have food stamps in Texas, like everywhere else. I know human nature is to raise the stakes when making an emotional argument.
So that makes what she said disingenuous?
Of course the benefit to risk equation is not equal. It never has been and never will be. The ruling class will always step on and take advantage of the unfortunate and unlucky. But adding to the momentum to open the economy back up is expecting those entry level and front line workers to risk MORE than they did before the pandemic for no added benefit for themselves. It is they who pay the even bigger price while it is others who want the economy open which results in an even bigger inequality. Sorry you think it's a game.
The answer to your question thiugh lies somewhere not in unemployment benefits but in a guaranteed minimum income for all.
Yes, it has likely temporarily delayed some deaths that will occur while the population builds herd immunity.Sweden just past three thousand deaths while doing nothing.
So adjusting for population that would put US deaths at a baseline of 90K.
You'd have to factor in some other stuff like US being the land of pre-existing conditions like diabetes, hypertension and obesity - all of which clearly exacerbate the underlying symptoms of COVID-19. Sweden is consistently rated as a top 5-10 country when it comes to overall heath while US is typically somewhere in the 30's. It's hard to put a number on that but let's call it another 10-12K.
So can we say the steps we've taken to mitigate the spread of the virus saved 25-27 thousands lives up to this point? Who knows. But food for thought.
Which question?You failed to answer the question. Wanna try again?
Which question?
Hard to say and safe for who? I'm not sure what opening up again even looks like. If it means opening up as nothing even happened, I'd say after the coming winter's flu season. A vaccine may come before then, or one may never come at all.Lol.
When do you think it will be safe enough to open up again?
And no, when things are equal risk does not qualify as an answer.
The only deaths we can prevent without a cure or vaccine are those prevented by potentially overwhelming the health system.
FYI, here is the CDC's guide to safe reopening strategies, and which the Trump administration apparently vowed would "never see the light of day". So, let there be light....
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883736-CDC-documents.html#document/p2
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6883736/CDC-documents.pdf
I don't know enough about her to lable her that."Not candid or sincere" - yes.
How is that the conclusion he draws from this, and why is everything so ****ing stupid all the time?!
I don't know enough about her to lable her that.
My whole point is she was sent to jail because she didn't apologize for trying to get by. People are wired differently. Maybe she's not used to accepting help?
Educate her. Throwing her in jail does nothing imo. It's a judge flexing and trying to make an example out of her.
She's already out of jail. The Lt. Gov paid her fine. She'll probably have a job with Fox News by this weekend.
I just clicked Like to like candrew’s post and I got some site response, “do you want to like this post?” Like wtf is that garbage @Jason? Of course I wanted to.