The Thriller
Well-Known Member
We seem to just be content with things
But, as I stated when this all began, that we need to be as accurate as possible in our appraisals and we need to be self-reflective enough to reassess and recalibrate. My concern was that we’d lock in to a position and get tunnel vision. And we’re approaching this as “sides,” or as if we were assigned a position in debate class and we’re mindlessly arguing it because that’s what we do.1a. Give it more time.
1b. The people protesting are among the most disenfranchised in society, have the least amount of access to healthcare, and are disproportionately among those without ability to be tested.
2. Videos are everywhere. For such big protests, most people were very responsible and most all worse masks and practiced social distancing.
3. The infrastructure of these communities was hit the hardest, and the testing results were getting now are more reflective of the communities that didn’t get hit with protests and riots, so we’re undercounting because these communities didn’t just “magically” not have COVID.
4. The protestors were only a small fraction of the population, and they congregated in cities but then dispersed back to their home communities, so it’s impossible to measure the spread among those individuals because the actual rates will get distributed across different communities and be difficult to track.
We seem to just be content with things
So Spain’s is a little hard to visualize because the scale is thrown off by the fact that they somehow raised 2k people from the dead at the end of last month.
However, you’ll notice that there haven’t been any spikes. The spikes predicted with states opening up 6 weeks ago don’t appear anywhere in this.
Do we have a summary on all states that opened and what their average rates are? If we're appealing to a national plateau in cases being misleading while other places are rising, why has the death rate continued to fall and not plateaued, as well? How are we accounting for increase in testing?Uh, this is exactly what’s happening.
Cases are only plateauing overall because New York and NJ have dropped significantly while others who’ve opened continue to rise.
View attachment 9474
View attachment 9475
Do we have a summary on all states that opened and what their average rates are? If we're appealing to a national plateau in cases being misleading while other places are rising, why has the death rate continued to fall and not plateaued? How are we accounting for increase in testing?
I've got you covered. Here's my post from over two months ago:No idea about the first. So far as the second, my understanding, at least based on what I heard about AZ last week, is that more testing is being done but the positive test results are actually coming back at a greater rate. I assume deaths are going down because of the oft-rumored weather. IDK. But this could be setting up to be a perfect storm of a ******** in the fall imo. We’re all slowly re-opening...deaths and hospitalizations are going down...people will feel more and more comfortable and socialize more and more over the next 3-5 months, and then the fall and winter come. And then bam! Numbers, hospitalizations and deaths could soar. Sort of scary to think about.
For about a month, I’ve been meaning to post my view on this but haven’t gotten around to doing so because it requires adding a lot of context. The tl;dr form of this is that my suspicion is that our debate regarding how and when to open up is going to get us through the next 6-8 weeks. We’ll endlessly debate what effect this is having on infection rates and ultimately my suspicion is that these stay relatively unchanged, if not continue to decrease. If there’s a bump, I don’t see this being something massive, and there are a whole host of reasons that I’ll have to elaborate on later, but I’ll have to settle for just laying out the bare bones with that. We will debate what we’re seeing. If rates don’t spike, we will favor more palatable narratives of how we’ve opened up slower, people are being more cautious, and how we’re still not testing sufficiently (I’m not saying any of these are untrue, just stating what how we’ll be qualifying what we’re seeing). Ultimately, we’re going to arrive in August/September and a different narrative will really heat up: the summer suppression of the virus. Currently, this is an argument castigated as ignorant and wishful (but is and will change). This will become more accepted because the argument will be highlighted as more nuanced: that it wasn’t the summer and the heat killing the virus (as all those ignorant rubes believed), but because the summer facilitated social gathering in ways that were more consistent with social distancing — that people congregated more outside and away from each other. This will allow a few things to come out. One is that it will reinforce the idea of social distancing helping curtail the virus, rather than ‘magic’ or anything implemented by the administration, but it will also reassure and provide a level of vindication for the initial doomsday models of millions dead. After all, those represent one side of the simplistic dichotomy of ‘science and facts’ vs. ‘ignorance and greed,’ and how palatable is vindication that the original models weren’t wrong, just mistimed? Our discussion will shift to the fact that COVID started at the very end of winter, and we had massive casualties. True, it did not reach the millions projected (‘because we acted’), but the summer has provided false hope for all those who deny science, and they’ve prematurely spiked the football in their ignorance and arrogance, but now [end of summer] we’re headed into a full winter where the death toll will be like nothing we’ve ever seen. Lots of talk of “we’re ****ed” and “we have no idea what’s about to hit us.”
That’s the tl;dr. I’ll have to actually clarify most of this, but not now. Maybe this weekend. I’m not saying there isn’t a lot of truth in some of this, but this narrative is and will be coalescing over the coming months.
Tl;dr COVID is like the Conley trade. We didn't know exactly what we were getting, but could prognosticate he's a pretty good player and that his floor would even be a good player. But he came out with anomaly after anomaly. When his performance didn't match at all what was promised, it was easy to fall back on the idea that there's no way that continues, that he bounces back. But the further we went along, the less that actually happened. And the more the eyeball test didn't show what we thought, the more many dig in to find advanced stats to say "see, he's playing good." And, of course, you get the occasional game or stretch where people come out of the woodwork to try to call people to repentance.
Can we bring back smallpox and polio while we're at it?The question is can we move Covid for a pick and some Ebola? Maybe we can swap Covid and a first for a few season of whooping cough.
Do we have a summary on all states that opened and what their average rates are? If we're appealing to a national plateau in cases being misleading while other places are rising, why has the death rate continued to fall and not plateaued, as well?
No idea about the first. So far as the second, my understanding, at least based on what I heard about AZ last week, is that more testing is being done but the positive test results are actually coming back at a greater rate. I assume deaths are going down because of the oft-rumored weather. IDK. But this could be setting up to be a perfect storm of a ******** in the fall imo. We’re all slowly re-opening...deaths and hospitalizations are going down...people will feel more and more comfortable and socialize more and more over the next 3-5 months, and then the fall and winter come. And then bam! Numbers, hospitalizations and deaths could soar. Sort of scary to think about.