www.independent.co.uk
The nose swab is different than it used to be. I asked the doctor about that. He said it used to be quite painful and quite horrible but it's different now.
I don't think so. I went to test Utah to schedule the test originally but then we just called our primary doctor (copper view) and they said to come in on. So I don't know if they are part of test Utah but I don't think they are
I want my free cheese wah.
Well, according to my wife, it is vice versa
. She had a first test in april (because visiting a specific doctor required test) and she told me, that the one done in spring was not annoying or feelable at all. Testing was done in the same place and by the same company.
So it sounds like the one your wife, child, and yourself got were all non painful. That's cool.Well, according to my wife, it is vice versa
This time our daughter was most nervous, but she was brave and told us that it was no problem at all.
I've had two tests, the first one I got was very unpleasant. The second one was nothing. I don't think there was a huge difference in what they did, I just think the person who did the second one was better at not inflicting pain. Unless the standard was to try to impale a person's brain earlier and now they are like "you actually only need to get some mucous from way up there, impaling the brain is not required."
Same
The doctor who did mine yesterday said that they used to have to go way up the noise and hit the throat but they no longer have to do that.
I'm not an expert on how this works and oldschool franklin would be a better person to answer a question like this, but I think at some point they changed how they calculate unemployment and they only count people who are actively looking for work. If you don't have a job and aren't looking for one then you are not counted as an unemployed person. Same goes for a situation where you were looking for work but eventually gave up, even though if you could get a job you would.
This is right more or less. They only count people looking for a job, or who are capable of holding a job. So the number can be skewed a few different ways. One way is that a terrible economy can cause a lot of people to drop out of the job pool, to, in essence, give up and stop looking, making it look like unemployment is lower than is actually is.
There are six measures, plus we track labor participation rate . U6 includes all those you listed, unless they no longer want work.
It would mean less production, a smaller pie to divy up. Also, there is an old idea where retiring is good for the economy because one person steps aside which creates a higher paying job for another. It's an old economic fallacy but I don't remember the term for it.
