Here is a bit from one attorney looking at Dominion vote counting issues:
This is, actually, old news. I was reading about this scheme to do our vote counts through foreign-based (& possibly legally unprosecutable) corporations, way back in the 1990s. It has been an argument for having protections like paper ballots available for recounts, or computer images of each ballot available for inspection for audits. It has fueled my own imagination for a secure non-digital (analog) vote method....... capable of being "counted" by a simple scale or weighing of vote chips/cards/balls ...... all capable of being counted in full view/reading/object monitoring by all interested parties requesting observation of the polls......
A computer with a software package that contains specific portals for manipulation by paying interests from offshore, not subject to US law, parties. What a great idea. A pathway for buying election results. With Hillary Clinton's emoluments-collecting "charity" helping to pay for it all.
The attorney in this video has worked for Gen. Flynn and made significant progress in forcing unwilling Judges to finally concede point after point in that case, to uphold the law rather than just squash the investigation. tenacious to say the least.
I think this investigation/case is going to get on base.
It's a stretch to think it will stop States from certifying elections inside three weeks, but it will roll on three months into three years, and it will mean significant changes in the way things are done within the next two years.
I give Biden two years of media honeymoon, and then he will be impeached if the Dems haven't rolled out the vote to invoke the 25th Amendment on him and replace him with Harris by then. But the Republicans will take the house in two years, and will likely be able to keep Pelosi pretty tethered until then.
If there are enough states who cannot certify their vote by the Constitutional deadline, some say it will go the House to decide this election, and there will be one vote per state delegation, mostly Republican. But maybe enough RINO republicans to still give it to Biden.
At any rate, the media has completely abandoned objectivity here. There is no major media on the face of the earth who is not labeling the legal challenges as baseless and the claims of an actual voter win for Trump as some kind of crazy. Trumps statements have all been flatly described as "false". Not one reference in these media giants to any reasoned basis, just "False Claims" whatever.
A post like this one on Facebook or Twitter would simply be deleted as some kind of "racism" or whatever.
A point of notice for the mods, the attorney is a real person who has filed some real lawsuits. What she says in her interview is not of the character of speculation, it specifically outlines objective issues to be tried in court, which she says she has evidence for, saying further that she does not say things she cannot prove;.
And it is my opinion that proof is not always sufficient in legal matters. Courts are capable of ignoring proofs and ruling against facts. So we do not know what the rulings will be. I suggest here the entirely reasoned opinion that Biden will be the next US President regardless. I am however looking further down the road to what I consider to be a likely public response to information like this, regardless of what courts may rule.
