That's not the argument.
Just kidding, we need BIG ALL to play PG.
So what's your argument then when you said Larkin is smallest guy therefore we shouldn't draft him?
That's not the argument.
Just kidding, we need BIG ALL to play PG.
So what's your argument then when you said Larkin is smallest guy therefore we shouldn't draft him?
Not to mention Larkin tested out as the best athlete at the combine. If Larkin was 6-2 or 6-3 he would be going top 5.
It's an idiotic argument, especially coming from someone who spent so much time mocking those who didn't like Millsap- who plays a position where size is much more important IMO- because of his size.The "Larkin is smallest guy" therefore "he must suck" argument.
It features some nuance, you might have a tough time digesting it.
#InaneAndPointlessHashtagBro
No it doesn't. It's simplistic and ignorant.It features some nuance
guys, if hes moved those picks to Larkin and Saric, hes heard the jazz are looking for passing, triple threat players, also i bet they are looking for players who can get the ball to the bigs...
these players are 2 of the best passers in the draft.. saric might be the best, outside of MCW, he might be better tho..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbdgEw85jU4
saric is certainly a better passer than this years adam morrison, Nate Wolters