My first choice is picks. Second choice, I would take Barrett. Third choice, I would take Hero and then trade him for more picks. Fourth choice, I do not want anything to do with Tyler Hero.
First of all it’s Herro and second of all:
My first choice is picks. Second choice, I would take Barrett. Third choice, I would take Hero and then trade him for more picks. Fourth choice, I do not want anything to do with Tyler Hero.
*you’re
*you’re
It’s kind of hard to believe Clarkson isn’t pretty sought out.
The **** ton of picks would come from the heat in the late 20’s. I expect the wolves picks to be at best mostly in the low to mid 20’s. So that’s basically one decent shot at a star. We need multiple shots at a star, those are the unprotected Knicks picks the jazz covetWe will have a **** ton of picks. Our own plus Minnesota’s plus another teams when we trade Donovan. What are you talking about?
Agreed. I also think the Jazz can start selling off cap space for additional picks and/or swaps to potentially upgrade their chances in those years as well.The **** ton of picks would come from the heat in the late 20’s. I expect the wolves picks to be at best mostly in the low to mid 20’s. So that’s basically one decent shot at a star. We need multiple shots at a star, those are the unprotected Knicks picks the jazz covet
The **** ton of picks would come from the heat in the late 20’s. I expect the wolves picks to be at best mostly in the low to mid 20’s. So that’s basically one decent shot at a star. We need multiple shots at a star, those are the unprotected Knicks picks the jazz covet
Agreed. I also think the Jazz can start selling off cap space for additional picks and/or swaps to potentially upgrade their chances in those years as well.
The package the Knicks are rumored to be offering is their D package. It’s ****ing trash.Again, everyone knows the Knicks can offer the best package. Doesn’t look like they are so far. I’d take the Heat’s A package over the Knicks B package.
I'm not sure. I think the eventual plan is just to have 100 draft picks and a G-League roster. Makes for an exciting 82 game season.Eventually these picks need to turn into something and 22 year old players who average 20 PPG do not grow on trees. We can accumulate all the picks we want but we eventually need actual players.
Yes, this is one of the narratives that make no sense. If anything paying 1 or 2 young and really promising but still not having exploded stars is a good risk to take. While rebuilding, you will always have enough capspace simply because you won't be competing, you won't be signing expensive FAs in a push to eek out a few more wins. To me our willingness to get Barrett or Herro should be predominantly tied to our evaluation of them as players and not on the money we will have to give them. If we think they deserve the money and have the chance to be this good to justify that type of money - then do it! Buy low'ish on those types of players and see if you can strike gold with them. Worst case scenarios - they don't pan out and you more easily get to the salary floor over the length of the rebuild. And if the worry is that they will leave - you have tons of time until then... get them in the building, get a feel about them and about how much they like your franchise and city and if you get similar vibes to Mitchell over the last 2 years - sell them off for profit in a year or two time and add more picks.The idea that the Jazz wouldnt want Barrett or Herro because of paying them doesnt really float to me. Who else they going to pay? Not like a 2nd year max is going to kill your books with how much the cap is going to up in 2025.