Not sure why you would pick Duncan for the 90's, but you can go ahead and make your 00's pick
I was thinking the same thing...although I can see it from Numberica's perspective as well...you could take 90's Alonzo Mourning and 2000's Tim Duncan, or take 90's Tim Duncan (still a 22-12-3 all-star PF playing next to Robinson) and take a wing (Kobe or LeBron) #1 overall next. 90's Duncan was still a champion who came through in the Finals, so I can see it both ways, but picking 7th or 8th requires a fair amount of strategy.Not sure why you would pick Duncan for the 90's, but you can go ahead and make your 00's pick
I was thinking the same thing...although I can see it from Numberica's perspective as well...you could take 90's Alonzo Mourning and 2000's Tim Duncan, or take 90's Tim Duncan (still a 22-12-3 all-star PF playing next to Robinson) and take a wing (Kobe or LeBron) #1 overall next. 90's Duncan was still a champion who came through in the Finals, so I can see it both ways, but picking 7th or 8th requires a fair amount of strategy.
I was thinking the same thing...although I can see it from Numberica's perspective as well...you could take 90's Alonzo Mourning and 2000's Tim Duncan, or take 90's Tim Duncan (still a 22-12-3 all-star PF playing next to Robinson) and take a wing (Kobe or LeBron) #1 overall next. 90's Duncan was still a champion who came through in the Finals, so I can see it both ways, but picking 7th or 8th requires a fair amount of strategy.
Hmm I don't know. I was approaching it by trying to build the best team because if it was just stats, we wouldn't have to vote, we could just add up the pts, rebs, ast, ect. Probably a little bit of both.But isn't the point (which is why I changed my pick) total stats in fantasy? Not just building a great team?
Hmm I don't know. I was approaching it by trying to build the best team because if it was just stats, we wouldn't have to vote, we could just add up the pts, rebs, ast, ect. Probably a little bit of both.
Going with what prodigy said, it is the stats. Right?
Voting will decide the winner.
Going with what prodigy said, it is the stats. Right?
Picking Lebron over Kobe was just silly. Kobe was a better player than Lebron's ever been.
No the Voting will most likely be based on a couple factors - (team chemistry/overall make-up/build-up/talent level-championships)
It is about building the best team you possibly can, not just going by stats
No matter the criteria, it always ends up being more of a 'wow' factor/popularity contest.
Well isn't a decade too large of time span then? I mean the difference between 02-03 Shaq and 07-08, for example is pretty drastic. So you take his entire career or just an average of that decade? If that is the case Duncan is the better pick than Barkley.
Picking Lebron over Kobe was just silly. Kobe was a better player than Lebron's ever been.
So I could pick Mutombo in the 2000s because he was good back in 1994? But since he hung on until 2008 he is eligible?Besides, Shaq got picked in the 90's where there's no drop-off at all.
So I could pick Mutombo in the 2000s because he was good back in 1994? But since he hung on until 2008 he is eligible?