What's new

Jazz extend qualifying offer to Hayward

zyzz

Well-Known Member
https://www.deseretnews.com/article...xtend-qualifying-offer-to-Gordon-Hayward.html

Not surprising in the slightest, but still news I guess.

https://twitter.com/DJJazzyJody/status/482003621987364864
Jody Genessy
‏@DJJazzyJody
Jazz fully intend to bring Gordon Hayward back. It'll be interesting to see what the market is willing to offer him.

gordon-hayward-rapper-500.jpg
 
Last edited:
Cool.

I think he'd be a really good fit next to Wiggins, Gordon, and probably Parker too, FWIW.
 
I am hoping that by securing Hayward as a "restricted free agent" the Jazz are just attempting to protect their money invested in Hayward, in hopes for a sign and trade deal this off-season. I could be wrong but I think it's a little ironic that this happened 6 days before the free-agent dead line and the day before the NBA draft. Maybe they are hoping to offer Hayward as a trading piece to trade up??
 
This also allows them to shop him in order to trade up, right?

Not unless you have a 'sign and trade' type of deal where all the teams, player and agent all agree on it. You can't trade a free agent.

I'd prefer to sign him to about $10 mil a year, but I'm betting he's going to get closer to $12-14 mil. Blame that on the salary cap continuing to increase.
 
Not unless you have a 'sign and trade' type of deal where all the teams, player and agent all agree on it. You can't trade a free agent.

I'd prefer to sign him to about $10 mil a year, but I'm betting he's going to get closer to $12-14 mil. Blame that on the salary cap continuing to increase.
Thanks. Doesn't that move go only to assist the Jazz's hand to keep him for a sign and trade before he ships out to Boston?
 
Thanks. Doesn't that move go only to assist the Jazz's hand to keep him for a sign and trade before he ships out to Boston?

Not really; a qualifying offer doesn't implicitly mean that we only want him for a year, but rather that we want to ensure a player is a restricted FA vs. unrestricted (which would occur in a week if we were to not extend a qualifying offer and then we wouldn't have the right to match any offer from another team). If a player agrees to the qualifying offer, they get a 125% increase on their last year of salary and will be an unrestricted FA next year.

The hope is that you retain him with your qualifying offer and negotiate a new, long-term contract that would kick in the following season.
 
Not really; a qualifying offer doesn't implicitly mean that we only want him for a year, but rather that we want to ensure a player is a restricted FA vs. unrestricted (which would occur in a week if we were to not extend a qualifying offer and then we wouldn't have the right to match any offer from another team). If a player agrees to the qualifying offer, they get a 125% increase on their last year of salary and will be an unrestricted FA next year.

The hope is that you retain him with your qualifying offer and negotiate a new, long-term contract that would kick in the following season.
Very well taught. Thanks.
 
Cool.

I think he'd be a really good fit next to Wiggins, Gordon, and probably Parker too, FWIW.

I've been saying this all along. Hayward is exactly the kind of player that you want around your star. Only question is "At what price?"
 
Luckily for us, I think Hayward lowered his value a bit this season. He didn't make any real progressions from last season other than improved rebounding and passing with more exposure. He basically proved that he could not lead a team successfully and is best as a complimentary player. For that reason, I think it would be crazy if someone offered him close to a max offer. I'm thinking around 9-11 million which would be an easy match for the Jazz. It would be a shame to lose Hayward right after drafting Wiggins, Parker, or Gordon.
 
Back
Top