What's new
By:

Jazz, George Hill taking contract talks down to wire

Assuming the Jazz want to extend Favs, Hill gets done, and Hayward comes back then they would need to r/e Favs just before Hayward signs this summer, right?
 
Even that max deal doesn't seem SO bad. Hill has taken us from the 9 seed to fighting for the third (not the only reason obviously but a big one).

I have some faith in us going over the cap if needed if we are a contending team.
 
The Jazz will most likely overpay. Th benefit is too high, basically securing (or coming much closer to) securing Hayward long-term.
 
♪alt13 said:
Assuming the Jazz want to extend Favs, Hill gets done, and Hayward comes back then they would need to r/e Favs just before Hayward signs this summer, right?
Click to expand...

We cannot R&E Favors if we R&E Hill, because we won't have the capspace.
 
Siro said:
3 years 88 million? Aaah... Way too much.
Click to expand...

Ya, that is way too much.

I can't believe people around here think he is worth that. Good hell. Make we want to barf.

Since when would any team in this league think George Hill would be part of a big 3? Not the Spurs or Pacers, but the Jazz do. Wtf?
 
stitches said:
We cannot R&E Favors if we R&E Hill, because we won't have the capspace.
Click to expand...

Unless there's a change in the new CBA, they'll have to wait for Favors to hit free agency and then use his Bird rights to go over the cap. Hill, Hayward and Gobert will take up too much cap space to do any more extensions.
 
I don't think I like the idea of paying Hill the max. I'm sorry, but I don't think he's a max-player, and he's on the wrong side of 30. If it's 20m a year, then okay, at least that's a tradable contract if Exum pans out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top