The Thriller
Well-Known Member
So. what's your point? can you construct your argument? because you are just raising questions with no clear point to them. Like:
What are you trying to say really?. My point is that we are a good team but we are not playing to our potential: pieces are meshing, players are struggling. It's fine to question whether or not the trade was worth it: if Conley (and his salary) was worth trading for instead of keeping Rubio. To which I said yes because we reached a plateau with Rubio as PG and Conley, playing at his normal or close to normal level, raise us to another level (championship contenders even). This has nothing to do the fact that Conley is right now struggling and that the team has some fixes to make. And yeah, we are going to lose some games in the process. We have lost some close ones against some really good teams and our schedule sucks.
And some of the posts lately has been plain dumb. Like someone comparing Conley to Shelvin Mack.
1. Who compared Conley to Mack? It wasn’t me. So direct your ire elsewhere.
2. Yes, asking questions is one of my major points. We absolutely should be reflecting on the Conley trade. We should also be looking to move on from exum. The second point being:
3. My point in bringing up the Kings and Pacers games is that head to head matchups don’t tell you much of anything. All teams, good or bad, can lose to anyone in the league. So bringing up one game against the Bucks, just isn’t useful imo. The best indicator of where we’re at is in the standings. Right now we are a mid level playoff team. Which, honestly, feels about right.
Unless things drastically change with Conley, we’ll finish in that 4-6 range... again.