It's very similar to the way you don't allow yourself to accept what evidence tells you about our world, in some ways.
Karl Malone's take on all of this......?
- Thread starter carolinajazz
- Start date
It's very similar to the way you don't allow yourself to accept what evidence tells you about our world, in some ways.
If it's from CARM, you can bet its wrong without even linking to it. Slick and his band are true wing-nuts.
Don't let the door hit you.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
......"hate" is a strong word! I certainly "hate" the lifestyle of a lot of humans, but don't hate them as a person. Don't you "hate" wicked people who do "wicked" things? You would like for them to change there ways, I'm sure. Society in general, has established "laws" that protect there citizens from harm. These laws vary from country to country and state to state. I, along with many others, feel that there are higher laws even than those set by humans. We feel these laws are beneficial to all humans whether they obey them or not. We choose to obey them. When governments and society in general decide to "make up" there "own" set of laws and consider the others "archaic" or outdated, well that's when the problems arise. When laws for sexual morality are up to the individual whims of humans then what we presently see on this globe is the sad state of affairs we must endure. In addition to STD's that run rampant amongst heterosexuals who have multiple partners, the same problem even worse exists amongst homosexuals. And then there's the undeniable FACT that if everyone bought into the homosexual/lesbian lifestyle on this planet, then the human race would eventually die off.
This link may prove helpful. https://daleoleary.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/the-syndemic-of-stds-among-gay-men/
**** you.
1. I don't trust that you have any secret knowledge from a higher source of law. So I'll stick to society creating laws that actually protect everyone and advance their rights and interests.
2. STDs, like most social problems, tend to be less common in socially progressive locales.
3. Humanity wouldn't die off even if everyone turned gay overnight. What kind of simple-minded proposition is that? Gay people are just as capable of having children as anyone else.
Julie Greengiant
Well-Known Member
It's like staring into the void
scootsy
Well-Known Member
Weren't paying close attention to the conversation were you? The only thing I was talking about was a relationship between homosexuality and promiscuity. And if you don't like what was already referenced, take a look at HIV percentages among homosexuals.
I said nothing against you or your position yet you still find a way to treat me like a ****ing douchebag. What's your deal?
Julie Greengiant
Well-Known Member
A matter of logistics. HIV is more easily spread through anal sex which homosexual men have quite a bit more of. There is no reliable statistical evidence to support the claim that gay men have more sexual partners than straight men and women.
However, it is possible as promiscuity is mostly a cultural behavior. I don't really see the relevance. If you don't like promiscuity just speak out against it. But you (not you, Julie) just don't like gays, and promiscuity happened to be the justification you're using because it's more acceptable than admitting your dislike for homosexuals regardless of any statistics.
scootsy
Well-Known Member
I have nothing against gays, I was only participating in a tangent debate comparing homosexuality and promiscuity. I don't know why you all here think that me saying gays have on average more sexual partners than straight men means that I am anti-gay. And I feel the same way about Carolina thinking I was backing her up. I wasn't doing either.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
.....man meets man. Man has sex with man. Man cannot be impregnated by another man. No children result. Woman meets another woman. Woman has sex with woman. Woman cannot be impregnated by another woman. No children result. Life span of humans is 74 years. No reproduction, human life ends shortly thereafter. What am I missing here?