Julie Greengiant
Well-Known Member
Artificial insemination, ding dong.
Karl Malone's take on all of this......?
- Thread starter carolinajazz
- Start date
Artificial insemination, ding dong.
Sandy Braille
Banned
Lol, way to completely miss his point and go off on a very-loosely (and I'm being generous here) side-tangent.
Not sure how y'all can deny some sort of currently-existing relationship between homosexuality and promiscuity. I think the better question is: will it go down as homosexual orientation becomes more mainstream? Personally, I think it will. No one is arguing that the two factors are causal.
Sandy Braille
Banned
What about HIV rates among women (genuinely curious-- this could either support or destroy your opinion)? Do women have anal sex as well?
And I suppose all of those gay people who do have children accomplished this incredible feat through wizardry.
Sandy Braille
Banned
For the record, lol @ some of you (well, CarolinaJazz) telling a gay poster straight-up that he chose his orientation. Made me giggle.
Sandy Braille
Banned
And praying, obviously.
The vast majority of HIV+ women are straight. And women only make up around 23% of all cases. Gay women make up less than 5% of HIV infections among women, and about 1% of all HIV cases.
In other words, those who really care about HIV among gays should be encouraging female homosexuality as much as possible.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/wsw.htm
Julie Greengiant
Well-Known Member
dang i was just about to post those CDC statistics!
//r00t 4 Jazz
Well-Known Member
Wonder if the human race will ever progress enough that there wont have to be announcements for discriminated groups whether it be one's sexual orientation, race, skin color, religion or creed.
I would like to think I practice indifference, I'm not apathetic or indifferent to the people's plight of being discriminated against. But I'm saying that the indifference I feel is because I don't think anybody should feel the need to "tolerate" or "accept" anything from whatever discriminated group because acceptance or tolerance still seems like your saying there is something wrong with <insert group here>. Where as indifference is just people are people no matter who or what they are, the end.......
Still not coming across the way I meant to, the words are clear in my head but can't get it to translate to my fingers.
I would like to think I practice indifference, I'm not apathetic or indifferent to the people's plight of being discriminated against. But I'm saying that the indifference I feel is because I don't think anybody should feel the need to "tolerate" or "accept" anything from whatever discriminated group because acceptance or tolerance still seems like your saying there is something wrong with <insert group here>. Where as indifference is just people are people no matter who or what they are, the end.......
Still not coming across the way I meant to, the words are clear in my head but can't get it to translate to my fingers.
How do you think progress is achieved? Through indifference? There is nothing wrong with discussions like these.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
.....oh, so now we are going to repopulate the earth through "artificial insemination?" That would be fraught with problems. Would it only be the "rich" people who could afford such a thing? How long would it take for something to go wrong and such a method would end up producing perhaps "sterile" children who couldn't reproduce? What about BIRTH DEFECTS? According to one study, children conceived through in vitro fertilization have an increased risk of birth defects, such as heart or kidney problems, cleft palate, and undescended reproductive organs.
So we're supposed to continue responding to your "what if everyone turned gay" fantasy until we cover every possible angle? Have you been commissioned by the 700 Club to write a TV show? If so, I'm sure many would happily oblige. Otherwise, let's keep this relevant to our reality.