Mission accomplished.
Also regardless of the winner this will not get better and I'd bet on it getting worse.
I agree. If leadership doesn't not moderate the public passions, I think it is not actually good leadership.
Given the possibilities that Trump might be, oh, a Hitler of some kind, the reticence of some Republican Party honchos to endorse him might look responsible, and "leadership-like".
Given the established facts regarding Hillary, the failure of the DNC looks irresponsible to me, and corrupt beyond help.
But given the record of the those so-called "responsible" or "Leadership-like' Republicans, I could make the case stink as much on them as I could on the Dems.
Just the fact that Trump stands defiant against the collusion of the Bigs in both parties is the whole reason about thirty percent of Americans will stand solid for him.
Colton, if you want moral leadership, you need to support Trump, or someone else who will rock this boat.
The only way real leadership can regain the consent and support of the American Public is to actually reject perps who disregard the US Constitutional separation of powers and who are this corrupt.
I say we have a yellow journalism binge going on in the major media, if not also in the leftwing and rightwing fringes, that is feeding the public panic and hysteria and distracting the public from real issues and covering up real facts the people should know.
Shame on our corporate media.
