As always, rhetoric needs context. Words need definitions, too.
You are a pretty absolute materialist, you believe "Science" can properly only be applied to the material universe, and since other dimensions of existence have no vector in the plane of this dimension, you choose to ignore the mathematics that suggests there are other possibilities.
An ideologue is someone who believes in a system of ideas constructed in a certain way. You are an ideologue as a materialist.
I don't even know WTF you're talking about. I believe that the many-world interpretation of quantum mechanics to be an elegant and plausible look at the mathematics, but I remain agnostic about its validity as it does not meet the criteria for science. But since godists don't like MW interpretation because it messes up with how they want the universe to be, I'll assume you're talking about something else.
So point out this mathematics to me so I can properly ignore it.
Also, you're right about the materialism part. I am wholly materialist, and I don't understand what immaterialism even means.
Materialism is foundational to a number of political theories, including Marxism, Progressivism, Secular Humanism, and Fascism. All deny "God", the theory of of a sovereign all-powerful relevant ruler of the universe that applies some absolute set of moral values and executes judgment on the world. Without such a theory, we poor humans get to make up our own rules, and there is no one who can stop us if somehow we assert and maintain the necessary force of power.
This is like when I'm with my atheist friends, and they bring up Christianity and the middle ages, or Islam and the current age, to show what a rotten thing religion inherently is. It's boring and cliche when they bring it up, and it is the same when you do. As for rights, I question if morality has any meaning at all from the religious perspective. After all, if some things are fundamentally right or wrong, then gods are unnecessary, and we can make those discoveries ourselves. If what is right and wrong are only so because they are deemed so by a god, then power is the only right. Morality has no meaning if we poor humans are not free to make our own rules.
A world managed by a super government staffed by hordes of very expert authorities on every possible issue, rather than on the will of humans possessed of innate rights including the right to displace governments in times of governmental bad behavior. .. . could be an oligarchy, or any form of statism. Marx at least theorized that governments would die someday in the hallowed twilight of errant humanity. . . . when we all become sufficiently evolved to not care about anything, and when the resources of the world would just assemble themselves into the stuff we need. yep. AI just might do all that work for us. lol.
I don't believe in fairy tales. I think you do.
The part where I see you wanting "things to stay the same" is as in under present global management. Which is fascist because it's corporate interests that are meaningful, and the little people really don't get meaningful votes for their government.
You might have a lot of ideas about how we can make things better. That's progressive. Progressivism today refers to a specific vision of progress that some very influential folks subscribe to and talk about in "The Club", and in general in various elite circles. I haven't seen you objecting to that vision.
You're arguing with the caricature you created of me in your head. I don't care about government, as you define it, at all. I'd happily vote for a Utah, or any other state's, to secede from the US. I like the Brexit decision. But I am not attached to either ideal. A global government with certain limitations is fine too. I don't know how every scenario would play out, and there many advantages/disadvantages to any system. What I actually am, is a humanist. I do believe in global camaraderie and cooperation, and I do want to "progress" toward that. I want human lives to be better, and I can't help but see "better" the way I see it, being an individual and all.
The ironic thing is, so do you. Your idea of better is just different. It's about god and inherent rights and whathaveyou. You just pretend to be above it all. But no one is.
