What's new

Number of Wins

Games that we score more points than our opponent


  • Total voters
    73
History tends to repeat itself.. The fact that not many teams have won 50 plus games with a team full of role players doesn't help the Jazz in this argument. I could hope to win the lottery too because hey I haven't done it before
I appears the answer to your question is almost every damn year. Got something else to troll about? Because I've yet to see you be close to correct about a single thing.
 
I know that.
I'm just everybody's friend. Just ask [MENTION=639]Joe Bagadonuts[/MENTION]
Yep, anybody who is surprised when the two of you suddenly become best buddies has not been paying attention. If you can work your magic on str8line I will really be impressed (because he seems to despise you for some reason).
 
Yep, anybody who is surprised when the two of you suddenly become best buddies has not been paying attention. If you can work your magic on str8line I will really be impressed (because he seems to despise you for some reason).

Lol.

That dude is full of hate. Big time.
 
11% cheerleaders here so far. Kinda isolated statistically from the rest of us, gotta be because of the principle of the thing. rah rah rah. Go Jazz. Win.

I checked the 49 win box and note that Utah sports doesn't run the way sports do in other places. Other places the coaches go get the best players they can. Utah has a socialist culture and government and sports mentality. It's important to believe without reason.

cheerleaders, yo.

I can't stand the sports reporters either. It's always like Utah is the eight wonder of the world if we win, and it's always the outsiders own the refs if we lose.
 
I appears the answer to your question is almost every damn year. Got something else to troll about? Because I've yet to see you be close to correct about a single thing.

how little your brain most be.. Last year I said Blazers finish higher then Jazz znd make playoffs while
Jazz would be at home watching and I took a bunch of crap from clowns like you. Yet I was right.. Just wait ill be proven right again this year when OKC finishes with a better record and then the following year you can just repost this crap you posted and be wrong yet again. sometimes I wish I had a tiny brain like you because life would be much easier.
 
Hawks had Multiple all stars on the team
Jazz have ZERO all stars on the whole team.

Next...

Very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a 15-year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.

My childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds- pretty standard really. At the age of twelve I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my *********. There really is nothing like a shorn *******... it's breathtaking- I highly suggest you try it.
 
Hawks had Multiple all stars on the team
Jazz have ZERO all stars on the whole team.

Next...

Please tell me you are pretending to be that obtuse.

first, you've disingenously changed your question, which was "win 50 without a superstar" to not "allstar"

So is Korver a superstar? Teague? Horford? Milsap? If so, you must believe there are 40 or so "superstars" in the league

Compare Horford to Gobert
Compare Milsap to Favors
Compare Korver to Hayward
Compare Teague to Hill

Are you seriously saying there is a significance difference in "star" power?
 
Very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a 15-year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.

My childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds- pretty standard really. At the age of twelve I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my *********. There really is nothing like a shorn *******... it's breathtaking- I highly suggest you try it.

Dr Jones transmogrifies into Dr Evil.
 
ooops my bad yall, Yall do have an all star now, George Hill is a much better player then Teague according to most around here so he is the player that is going take yall over the top.lol
To many homers around here and not enough realist.
 
Please tell me you are pretending to be that obtuse.

first, you've disingenously changed your question, which was "win 50 without a superstar" to not "allstar"

So is Korver a superstar? Teague? Horford? Milsap? If so, you must believe there are 40 or so "superstars" in the league

Compare Horford to Gobert
Compare Milsap to Favors
Compare Korver to Hayward
Compare Teague to Hill

Are you seriously saying there is a significance difference in "star" power?

simple Hayward is better then Korver, I give ya that but all the others the Hawks players are superior to the Jazz players you tried to sompare them too.
Teague multiple all star games, Hill zero
Millsap multiple asg favors ZERO
Horford multiple ASG, Gobert is a defender and liability on offense.
Teague isn't afraid of the big shot at the end of the game, Korver is one of the best shooters in the game, Millsap is a beast down low.. Those Hawks players are vastly superior then the Jazz ones and everyone that watches hoops know this except you moronic jazz fans
 
simple Hayward is better then Korver, I give ya that but all the others the Hawks players are superior to the Jazz players you tried to sompare them too.
Teague multiple all star games, Hill zero
Millsap multiple asg favors ZERO
Horford multiple ASG, Gobert is a defender and liability on offense.
Teague isn't afraid of the big shot at the end of the game, Korver is one of the best shooters in the game, Millsap is a beast down low.. Those Hawks players are vastly superior then the Jazz ones and everyone that watches hoops know this except you moronic jazz fans


You failed to defend your belief that you need a superstar to win 50 games. I assume you mean superstar to mean KD, Curry, LeBron-type players. If you think there are 15 superstars in the league, then "superstar" means "above average best player"

Which of the 4 Hawks allstars are superstars?
 
Last edited:
ooops my bad yall, Yall do have an all star now, George Hill is a much better player then Teague according to most around here so he is the player that is going take yall over the top.lol
To many homers around here and not enough realist.

The idea that Hill is a superstar who takes us over the top is so dumb that only you would even thing of the idea. Since you think that Teague is a superstar, I can see how you might believe this.

Have fun fabricating arguments -- you seem to be pretty good at playing with yourself.
 
Those Hawks players are vastly superior then the Jazz ones and everyone that watches hoops know this except you moronic jazz fans

Teague/Korver/Milsap/Horford as superstars who are vastly superior to Hill/Hayward/Favors/Gobert is moronic.
 
The idea that Hill is a superstar who takes us over the top is so dumb that only you would even thing of the idea. Since you think that Teague is a superstar, I can see how you might believe this.

Have fun fabricating arguments -- you seem to be pretty good at playing with yourself.

Teague isnot a superstar but he is an all star. Heck the Jazz don't even have one All Star on its roster but some are claiming 58 wins. That's homerism at its finest plain and simple
 
Teague/Korver/Milsap/Horford as superstars who are vastly superior to Hill/Hayward/Favors/Gobert is moronic.

TeagueMillsap and Horford are all all stars however and None of them Jazz players are. That is a fact so let that soak into your tiny brain for a minute
 
sorry I didn't mean superstar I meant all star when talking about 50 plus wins..
Jaz have ZERO all stars, Thjats not an opinion but that is a FACT jack
Zero Jazz in All star game again this year.
Sure some will use that it is a popularity contest but that's only for starters and the bench is voted by coaches and ZERO jazz all stars. Let that sink in for a minute bud before ya step up to the plate with a heavyweight like me
 
Top