sorry I didn't mean superstar I meant all star when talking about 50 plus wins..
Jaz have ZERO all stars, Thjats not an opinion but that is a FACT jack
Zero Jazz in All star game again this year.
Sure some will use that it is a popularity contest but that's only for starters and the bench is voted by coaches and ZERO jazz all stars. Let that sink in for a minute bud before ya step up to the plate with a heavyweight like me
But you absolutely won the argument that the Jazz have no allstars.
Are you trying to cause a ncolorado meltdown?Actually the Jazz have a 7 time all star on their roster now.
Actually the Jazz have a 7 time all star on their roster now.
history smistory.
What's he good for now?
So you admit you were full of **** when you claimed you had to have a superstar to win 50 games?Teague isnot a superstar but he is an all star. Heck the Jazz don't even have one All Star on its roster but some are claiming 58 wins. That's homerism at its finest plain and simple
They don't play in a big city or the Leastern conference. All star games don't mean **** when comparing the abilities of 2 players. Find a real argument because that one is pathetic. Millsap didn't ever get considered for an all star game until he left for the Leastern conference. Favors and Hayward are both All star in that conference and Gobert may have been as well.TeagueMillsap and Horford are all all stars however and None of them Jazz players are. That is a fact so let that soak into your tiny brain for a minute
All star is like a popularity vote in at an idiot convention. It doesn't mean Jack **** when comparing players from opposite conferences.TeagueMillsap and Horford are all all stars however and None of them Jazz players are. That is a fact so let that soak into your tiny brain for a minute
sorry I didn't mean superstar I meant all star when talking about 50 plus wins..
Jaz have ZERO all stars, Thjats not an opinion but that is a FACT jack
Zero Jazz in All star game again this year.
Sure some will use that it is a popularity contest but that's only for starters and the bench is voted by coaches and ZERO jazz all stars. Let that sink in for a minute bud before ya step up to the plate with a heavyweight like me
Kobe Bryant was an all star last year no ?? Possibly one of the worst offensive players in the league. You probably still think Lavine is destined for greatness.
It's going to be so great when the Jazz are winning this year and all your pathetic trolling comes to an abrupt halt.
Who has more wins this season? Boston or the Jazz?
That's a good question. Everything broke right for Boston last year and they won 48 games - Vegas had them at 42.5 so it's fair to say they over-achieved.
Horford is a help (although over-rated IMO) but the fact remains this team's fortunes depend on a 5'9" 175 pound PG. And they still don't have anyone who can stop people at the rim.
If Favors and Gobert each play at least 70 games I think it will be close. My guess Utah wins 50 and Boston stands pat at 48.
What realistic prospects do we have for an All Star in our ranks this year? Who is going to be lighting up the stats to that extent? Who is going to give us the boost to get to 54 wins?
I think Jazz management historically works on a theory of discipline over spectacular personal exploits, teamwork and play execution that can win. But even that takes real talent, or really real discipline.
Being on an all NBA team means way more than being an all star does.All star is like a popularity vote in at an idiot convention. It doesn't mean Jack **** when comparing players from opposite conferences.
I really enjoy log as a poster. I disagree with him about the Jazz's outlook this year but I am glad that he is back.Yeah, he's being pessimistic but he doesn't suck.
Just don't bring up which iteration of Van Halen is best. His last post before going into exile was a rant regarding this subject.
I am going with 55 wins.
Anyone who says Hagar doesn't know their VH.