What's new

*OFFICIAL* 17 on 26, Donovan Mitchell is the Monta Ellis watch thread

This is comical, as you’re the one that’s started two or three threads about this.

I take it you don’t take your BIG AL and Corbin apologetics into account on your “record”? At a certain point, your obvious trolling is as tired as the group-think you think you’re crusading against.

You mean how Utah always surpassed expected wins under Corbin and have (unfortunately) fallen short each season so far under QS?

Or how advanced stats proved all those Big Al sets y'all cried about for so long ended up being the most efficient Utah ran? Oh, that's right, that kept Alex Burke from becoming Dwayne Wade and pissed off poor Roger Braille. Who were all those other future All Star youngins Corbin held back by winning?
 
You mean how Utah always surpassed expected wins under Corbin and have (unfortunately) fallen short each season so far under QS?

Or how advanced stats proved all those Big Al sets y'all cried about for so long ended up being the most efficient Utah ran? Oh, that's right, that kept Alex Burke from becoming Dwayne Wade and pissed off poor Roger Braille. Who were all those other future All Star youngins Corbin held back by winning?
lol, k m8.
 
Franklin is still stumping for Corbin? Good lord. The guy was a trash head coach.

There’s no doubt that you’re a very smart guy. . . but that will always be a bad take. It’s hard to see that as anything other than trolling.

That’s the wrong hill to die on friend.
 
Last edited:
My question for Franklin is what do you want to see the team do with DM then? I'm in the camp that his efficiency will improve this year. Might not become Steph Curry but it'll get better with less pressure. So if it stays low what should they do? Trade while his perceived value is high? Dump it?
 
My question for Franklin is what do you want to see the team do with DM then? I'm in the camp that his efficiency will improve this year. Might not become Steph Curry but it'll get better with less pressure. So if it stays low what should they do? Trade while his perceived value is high? Dump it?

I want him to improve too. I think he will but I have reservations that he'll ever become a very efficient player. A couple years here and there slightly above 57 ts% is his ceiling IMO, especially since he isn't risking an All Star bid by dropping his scoring down below 18 ppg.

Trading him isn't a realistic option. The fanbase would be irate for starters, and they're on board with a championship push this year. I think most of us believe it's possible too. However, his trade value would be insane and could net a lot if the right partner was found. Who is giving up a true closer tho? Nobody.
 
It's hilarious how so many basketball fans can't understand the concept of context. Donovan is a young second year player who plays one of if not the most difficult position in the league.... guard. He's also been the main scoring option on a poor to average scoring team in those l two seasons. And he's been the ONLY shot creator on said team. It is not surprising at all that he's been inefficient. Just about any player in his situation would be.

Odds are very good that this thread isn't going to age well. Now that the Jazz have more offense on this team and two more shot creators we're going to see Donovans true efficiency and it's likely going to be much higher.
 
Last edited:
It's hilarious how so many basketball fans can't understand the concept of context. Donovan is a young second year player who plays one of if not the most difficult position in the league.... guard. He's also been the main scoring option on a poor to average scoring team in those l two seasons. And he's been the ONLY shot creator on said team. It is not surprising at all that he's been inefficient. Just about any player in his situation would be.

Odds are very good that this thread isn't going to age well. Now that the Jazz have more offense on this team and two more shot creators we're going to see Donovans true efficiency and it's likely going to be much higher.

Nope, not allowed. I already banned all defenses used for Carmello Anthony's chucking career. Besides, this idea that a player needs to shoot because nobody else can - in other words those shots and scoring will disappear - has been shown numerous times to be a fallacy. If you're going to get snobbish and mock the idea of others as hillarious from your intellectually superior perch then you shouldn't proceed with utter bull ****.

DM didn't need to chuck shots. End of story. No excuses.
 
Mitchell was the main reason of most of our losses. His win/loss split numbers are astounding. If plays bad he really tanks his team, jacks shoot after shot at low efficiency and the coach has no plan B. And his career 43% and 35% from 3 and measly 4 FTA is really subpar. He must improve or the team is going to disappoint.
 
Mitchell was the main reason of most of our losses. His win/loss split numbers are astounding. If plays bad he really tanks his team, jacks shoot after shot at low efficiency and the coach has no plan B. And his career 43% and 35% from 3 and measly 4 FTA is really subpar. He must improve or the team is going to disappoint.
Lol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Mitchell was the main reason of most of our losses. His win/loss split numbers are astounding. If plays bad he really tanks his team, jacks shoot after shot at low efficiency and the coach has no plan B. And his career 43% and 35% from 3 and measly 4 FTA is really subpar. He must improve or the team is going to disappoint.
By the same logic:

Mitchell was the main reason of most of our wins. His win/loss split numbers are astounding. If plays bad the rest of the team can't pick up the slack and the coach has no plan B. The team must improve or they'll continue to disappoint when Donovan doesn't bail them out.
 
Back
Top