What's new
By:

*OFFICIAL* 17 on 26, Donovan Mitchell is the Monta Ellis watch thread

As for the Monta Ellis comparisons:

Donovan's numbers through two seasons:
22.1 ppg
.539 TS
+5.0 +/- On/Off per 100 possessions

Monta's career:
17.8 ppg, with 2 seasons above 22.1
.523 TS, with 2 seasons above .539 (neither of the seasons with scoring above 22.1 ppg)
-1.5 +/- On/Off per 100 possessions, with 0 seasons above +5.0

Monta did not put together a single season as good as Donovan's career to date. Donovan's far from a perfect player, but he's already arguably a top 5 shooting guard in the NBA.
 
New_Jazz_Order said:
Mitchell was the main reason of most of our losses. His win/loss split numbers are astounding. If plays bad he really tanks his team, jacks shoot after shot at low efficiency and the coach has no plan B. And his career 43% and 35% from 3 and measly 4 FTA is really subpar. He must improve or the team is going to disappoint.
Click to expand...

your mom was telling me all about disappointment and you just the other day
 
Mitch is very lucky he ended up on a good team that just happened to need some scoring spark. Or he'd be dudded a chucker like Monte. But if he doesn't improve he'll get exposed.
 
His TS% in the post season are a joke. And his regular season TS% is very pedestrian. Numbers don't lie. DM has to do a massive improvement here. Offensive efficiency rules the league.
 
New_Jazz_Order said:
His TS% in the post season are a joke. And his regular season TS% is very pedestrian. Numbers don't lie. DM has to do a massive improvement here. Offensive efficiency rules the league.
Click to expand...
Now tell me about all the other amazing 22 year old second year players leading their teams to the playoffs.
I will wait

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
New_Jazz_Order said:
Mitch is very lucky he ended up on a good team that just happened to need some scoring spark. Or he'd be dudded a chucker like Monte. But if he doesn't improve he'll get exposed.
Click to expand...
Good team? Oh, you mean the team with zero players who have ever been all stars?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
fishonjazz said:
Good team? Oh, you mean the team with zero players who have ever been all stars?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

How how about an All NBA guy and DPOY ? He alone makes a team good. And all those vets on the team counted for something. They all make a good team, Mitch just adds to all of that. If he ended up on some team like Suns he'd be poor mans Booker at this point in time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top