It is the opposite. You call every move a tanking move almost as if your reputation or something depends on it. Many levels to tanking.. stealth tanking. Huge conspiracy theorist.
Its not true at all... I don't call every move a tanking move... quite literally have said the opposite at times. You are just making **** up.
When someone offers an alternative explanation you dismiss it without actually rebutting it.
I rebutt... some people don't accept or move the goal post or just offer their alternative explanation. Playing the young guys and seeing what they have has very clearly been a method of tanking... it doesn't just have to be about tanking... it can also be exactly what it is... but it will lead to more losing almost always. There has been exactly one GM who has been direct about tanking and what he was doing... the league literally ended up removing him from his job and flattened lotto odds because of it. No one would ever even hint that they were tanking ever and it is in their best interest to strongly deny doing anything that would hint at tanking.
When FO says they are not tanking, you say they lie.
Whether they are tanking or not or lying or not I simply provided examples of how I judge actions and not words. Like when they say they are building around Don and want to keep him yet they are negotiating serious deals to trade him with multiple teams. Call it lying or just being disingenuous or telling part of the truth that is most flattering.
The team is still fighting to win every game, yet you claim the tank is on.
Players play and coaches coach... it isn't that hard to understand.
And you never answered my question. How are we using the tanking talk to fuel us all year if its actually true?
Did the player put it on a poster board and slap it every night before hitting the court? Or is that something they say. Just like when dudes are like "this is for all the haters". If there were tanking rumors or not this season I would promise you it wouldn't change our win loss record at all.
I'm gonna spoil a good trap now.. But my follow up question to this was:
Do you think you are better in tune with our FO than our players?
Maybe? why is this even relevant? Players and front offices aren't always aligned and even Danny said yesterday that their goals might bump up against each other... he tells players he is out looking for someone better than they are cuz that's his job.
Thats a strong defensive reaction. Also what social media companies have to do with managing basketball? Its B2C and we are talking B2B in a business where relationships matter more than in most other businesses. My post was provokative and exaggarated, but Im surprised it pushed you this far.
You painted this utopia where business no longer look out for their best interests and hold hands and skip through the forest so everyone can win. Businesses have always worked together whether its B2C or B2B... I literally live and work in the B2B world and have made a great living there. Nothing I said was incorrect. Businesses play nice if there are benefits to both parties. Once there are not benefits the relationships change. With companies that have direct competing interests they only work together if they have to... and no one shares any extra information they don't have to. Danny has some seriously high stakes high pressure negotiations he handles... why would he want the other team he negotiates with to know the complete truth?
Being honest when speaking to media and revealing everything are the same thing? That is just silly, why would you say that?
You are essentially telling me what Danny tells us is true and we should trust it. I parts of it can be true... but he doesn't have to tell the whole story. Its okay to fill in the blanks... he isn't going to do it for you.
When he says "we want to see the young guys play". What does that mean? It means they want to see what they have... that is true. It also means they are fine with the consequences of that action... and they are smart right? So they will have considered those consequences. What are the consequences of playing young players who clearly weren't as good as the players in front of them?
But what happens if Danny says... "we want to play the young players... and we were fine with losing a few extra games to help our draft considerations". The reveal gets league attention. That is why we fill in the blanks or hold actions above words.