I am new here and I don't know people's personalities, but I seriously hope you are joking...
phew!
CAKAR = no GM of the Jazz
a bullet dodged.
You have to give Jazz a secound round pick, for that offer to be acceptable.
![]()
Can't trade Hayward if we match for 6 months. Just FYI
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am new here and I don't know people's personalities, but I seriously hope you are joking...
Just CAKAR being CAKAR. You'll get used to it. Some characters around here.I am new here and I don't know people's personalities, but I seriously hope you are joking...
Just CAKAR being CAKAR. You'll get used to it. Some characters around here.
I am considering them, which is why I'm torn. Dallas and Charlotte have shown a willingness to pay max money for Parsons and Hayward, which complicates things a bit.
1. If you make a habit of massively overpaying players, assuming some other team will bail you out if you get into trouble, you may end up with a treadmill team and few options outside a complete rebuild. This hasn't been as big a problem for large market teams because they're less concerned about going into the LT AND other teams' players demanding trades toward the end of their contracts will gladly agree to re-sign there. Utah faces much stricter financial and trade market constraints.
2. Kevin Love wants out, and will only re-sign with a small subset of teams. Utah is unlikely to ever make a top player's list of places they'll re-sign. Klay is both a better off-ball player and better on-ball defender than Gordo. Gordo + spare parts might not get you much. As stated above, that there are 2 teams willing to sign players of this caliber to max deals may be a sign that Gordo could be moved for decent assets. Still, just today Boston collected a 1st round pick and a young rotation big for cap space. Cleveland and Houston are probably still looking for ways to shed salary, and other teams may surface in the next year+. I'm hoping the Jazz can work a sign-and-trade.
The new TV deal is 2 years away. Will the extra revenue affect the cap starting in 2016/17 or 2017/18? If it's the latter, Gordo will opt out, and the jump in the cap will make virtually no difference. The projected cap for next season (2015/16) is $66.5mm, an increase of only $3.3mm over the 2014/15 cap. Presumably, if the TV revenue only starts affecting the cap in 2017/18, the 2016/17 cap will be around $70mm. Hayward will continue to take up over 20% of the cap through the third season of his deal.You're also abusing massively overpaid, as I've shown. Do a quick revenue calculation, add in about 500,000,000 in new annual tv revenue, then recalculate that cap a few years down the road. There's a reason multiple teams aren't hesitating to give him way more money than anyone thinks is close to reasonable.