Not the worst idea.Maybe take a break from JF, Arch.
Yet, I never did that.
It's weird how you can translate **** like this into meaning that.
I think the fox can be a number of different types of people like the antifa's distraction of BLM. The Fox can be those who's best interests is motivated by money and profits.
Are you not saying I justified the shooting because I called him a rapist? If not, who are you saying justified it because of this?That doesn't change the wrongness of using a months-old interaction to justify shooting the guy when his back was turned.
I commend you for doing so. I should have responded and recognized that you did. I was distracted by your next sentence that I read that I justified the shooting because of those details.I'm not surprised you would take my admission of my error and make it about you.
I'm borderline on the autism spectrum, and I can detect context like that. Why can't you?
Are you not saying I justified the shooting because I called him a rapist? If not, who are you saying justified it because of this?
Maybe is misread what you wrote. Who are you saying justified the shooting?
This is gold. Maybe you should remember if you're going to say that?!Was that you? OK.
How dare I take something about me and make it about me because you can't remember the conversation.I'm not surprised you would take my admission of my error and make it about you.
His history has nothing to do with him getting shot in the back. No one is saying that.I'm saying I can't see any other reason to bring up a criminal history in the context of this particular shooting.
Well it hasn't been godwinned a whole lot, so there is that.This is about where I’d expect this conversation to end up.
Good term! New to me. Gracias.Well it hasn't been godwinned a whole lot, so there is that.
This is gold. Maybe you should remember if you're going to say that?!
How dare I take something about me and make it about me because you can't remember the conversation.
His history has nothing to do with him getting shot in the back. No one is saying that.
His, history, however, is certainly up for discussion.
Well it hasn't been godwinned a whole lot, so there is that.
Yeah, "yet" can really change the meaning of a sentence. "I haven't killed any hobos"..."yet."Yet.
I understand the part where you admitted your wrongness. I've commended you for it. I'm not talking about that part or making that about me. I'm talking about what you said directly afterwards that made it about me.Again, the post with the "wrongness" quote was about me, not about you.
This stuff you say about this sounds a lot like JazzyFresh and similar posters. I don't keep track of every quote by every poster.
Could you explain why it is relevant, please? If it has "nothing to do with him getting shot in the back", why is it in the conversation? Why did you bring it up?
It's a very complicated issue. There are many examples of racism or police injustice that aren't skewed to drive the message.
I don't think any man should be shot in the back 8 times. I put blame on the police for not arriving at a better resolution. I also blame Blake, who's a rapists, abuser, chronic police fighting jackass that did exactly what no one should do unless they wanna get shot by the cops. It's really not that hard to me. No one wants to mention that and if you do, you're a "moran."
I didn't know if you were saying smart guns in a sarcastic way or if that really existed. I googled it. TIL about smart guns.I have an idea: Make them keep their gun in their trunk, and record every time they open the locker.
Also, why don't cops have smart guns?
For the 10th time, him being a rapist has nothing to do with him being shot. Are we clear?
A conversation that details more about people being conversed about tends to add more details in things like a discussion forum, the newspaper, radio, television. This is not new.
If people are saying his rape allegation had nothing to do with his shooting, why are you so determined or are going out of your way to try and silence that?
Have you read about it, btw?
Thinking the shooting was unjust and could have been handled different and talking about the background of those involved in the incident are not mutually exclusive.
Oh, I brought it up because I had just finished reading about it online and it made me pissed. Sorry, but not sorry I brought that up.
Yeah, "yet" can really change the meaning of a sentence. "I haven't killed any hobos"..."yet."
You haven't been trying to restrict free speech.We've gotten to the part where I'm supposedly trying to restrict free speech. Won't be long now.