I understand the part where you admitted your wrongness. I've commended you for it. I'm not talking about that part or making that about me. I'm talking about what you said directly afterwards that made it about me.Again, the post with the "wrongness" quote was about me, not about you.
Lol.This stuff you say about this sounds a lot like JazzyFresh and similar posters. I don't keep track of every quote by every poster.
So when you write garbage or can't follow a conversation because you can't keep track of putting words into other's mouth your next tactic is to say that I remind you of a guy that spews utter garbage and stuff I disagree with?
@LogGrad98 there's a mini me example of Godwin's Law.
For the 10th time, him being a rapist has nothing to do with him being shot. Are we clear?Could you explain why it is relevant, please? If it has "nothing to do with him getting shot in the back", why is it in the conversation? Why did you bring it up?
A conversation that details more about people being conversed about tends to add more details in things like a discussion forum, the newspaper, radio, television. This is not new.
If people are saying his rape allegation had nothing to do with his shooting, why are you so determined or are going out of your way to try and silence that? Have you read about it, btw?
Thinking the shooting was unjust and could have been handled different and talking about the background of those involved in the incident are not mutually exclusive.