Keefe
Well-Known Member
Yep. They do the trade and add 1-2 vets with the MLE and they could have a strong 3-4 years.
Predict the Rudy Gobert trade
- Thread starter Elizah Huge
- Start date
Yep. They do the trade and add 1-2 vets with the MLE and they could have a strong 3-4 years.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Brunson had some fun too.
The Mavs used our "funnel to Rudy" system to get wide open 3's. It's not all about isolation numbers.
So is Mitchell a 24% 3pt shooter in your eyes now?
Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
2020-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Atlanta, Charlotte, Indiana (they are weird), Knicks (if they give up on Don pursuit), Sacramento and NOLA are tough roster fits... but I'd put them in the list of maybes. Spurs, Bulls... I'd say Phoenix, Dallas, Memphis too but no way we do that if we keep Donovan.
I think the Rudy Gobert trade is likely to involve 2 or 3 teams. It's advantageous to involve more than one team's assets, and there aren't many teams that have all the assets the Jazz would want.
If Rudy only getting isolated 13 times is avoiding him I wonder what Donovan getting isolated 11 times means.
Of course these Donovan haters won’t see it that way. The system is flawed in the playoffs we have seen it for two years in a row. We don’t have the personnel to run that system.
I don't care about your argument with Cy - it's stupid to use a 13 sample size as some sort of "Gotcha" against Gobert. It'd be one thing if you did it once to make a clear point against people who do the same thing against Mitchell, but you've prattled on about the 1.92 ppp figure for several posts, without any context to explain that you know it's a stupid argument.
WC must be 14 years old. Dude has the IQ of someone who plays Fortnite too much.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Exactly. We don't have the personnel, and most likely, the system wouldn't work anyway.
He shot terribly in the playoffs from 3 that is 100% a fact. It contributed to us losing.
13 possessions matter in the playoffs my man.
This has been explained to you so many times that I've lost all hope you'll ever get it.
You are losing an argument (shocker) as usual and resort to insults. Rinse and repeat.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Oh cool. You explained it to me? I'm so thankful. I must of forgotten that the system is perfect and it's all anybody's fault but Rudy's.
Would it kill you to argue in good faith?
Nobody is arguing the possessions don't matter. There's a difference between a possession mattering and a possession being representative of what would happen over the course of a much larger sample size. The Mavs understood this, which is why they didn't try it more than a couple times per game.
No you dunce, the system obviously isn't perfect.
Are you pretending to be stupid, or do you just never actually listen?
Dallas ranked dead last in possessions per game at 98 this year.
They went to isolation 1/4 of their possessions in the playoffs per game. Rudy is the only player with enough qualified possessions against isolation that averaged over 1.26 PPP. Hell besides Conley nobody on the team allowed more than 0.96 PPP.
Just interesting to me is all.
They went to isolation 1/4 of their possessions in the playoffs per game. Rudy is the only player with enough qualified possessions against isolation that averaged over 1.26 PPP. Hell besides Conley nobody on the team allowed more than 0.96 PPP.
Just interesting to me is all.
So is it reality that he's a bad shooter?
Answer: he isn't you dishonest scumbag. Just like Rudy isn't a bad isolation defender because of a tiny sample size.
Grow up and learn
A couple of times per game? Lol you mean 20-25% of their possessions?