All crimes have a number of false accusations and mistaken identities, but no other crime receives the same level of skepticism as sex crimes against women. Even if the number is as high as 10% (highly doubtful), that still means 90% of the sex crimes are valid (and are still a tiny percentage of the amount of crimes committed). But for some reason people are willing to overlook that 90+% because of the slight possibility of a false accusation, and the presumption of innocence is typically toward the man. Why are people only concerned with the lives of men being destroyed when a vast majority of the lives destroyed are the victims?
And why don't we have the same type of horror about other types of crime, when our prisons and jails contain people who have been falsely imprisoned? Should we not investigate any burglaries because of the possibility that the homeowner sold or destroyed his stuff to defraud his insurance company? All homeowners are likely to be liars if a few of them are, right?
False accusations by women make my blood boil, and I would have no problem with charges being filed against those who use their personal vendettas in this way. But that would open a can of worms in this climate of "believe the man at all costs."
And why don't we have the same type of horror about other types of crime, when our prisons and jails contain people who have been falsely imprisoned? Should we not investigate any burglaries because of the possibility that the homeowner sold or destroyed his stuff to defraud his insurance company? All homeowners are likely to be liars if a few of them are, right?
False accusations by women make my blood boil, and I would have no problem with charges being filed against those who use their personal vendettas in this way. But that would open a can of worms in this climate of "believe the man at all costs."