You are 100% wrong on all of this. As always. You cherry pick and avoid the facts.
You have facts to present? Please start presenting them.
Then resort to insulting and accusing of bigotry. You have zero evidence of me being despicable of any kind. You think if I dont agree with you that makes me a bad person.
Actually, what I said was that your method of argumentation on this thread was horrible and made you look bad. You're right I don't know much about you, personally, except you think you have a cogent argument here, when you don't.
Nothing you have to say about this topic can be proven scientifically.
1) Science doesn't do proof.
2) Everything I have said is supported by the evidence of science. Feel free to pick one topic of fact you think is not. I ca use the laugh.
You would have laid the case out already if it were so. Where is it cause I dont see it? Just out this to rest already and state some scientific facts. Why drag this out?
Which fact would you like to see laid out?
So out of naming these things as ways athletes are protected from competition "Age groups, weight classes, yes gender, skill level, abled and disabled, Steroids, etc" you chose to base you argument around Steroids not being exactly like the other ways I listed. Thats your argument? Thats laughable that you think that is even argument.
Sorry, I was trying to be nice by not peeling back all of the stupidity. Since that's not an option, let's look at this in more detail.
1) Age groupings: this is a protection, and everyone expects that transgender athletes will compete in their age groups.
2) Weight classes: this is a protection, and everyone expects that transgender athletes will compete in their weight class.
3) Gender segregation: this is not a protection, it's segregation to allow the women to compete at all. Cisgender women athletes, overall, are competitive with transgender women athletes. No segregation needed.
4) Skill level: no such restrictions exist. Lebron James can go play rec ball if he so chooses.
5) Disabled leagues: this is not a protection, it's segregation to allow the disabled to compete at all.
6) Steroids: this is a protection, and everyone expects that transgender athletes will not take steroids.
Your argument is moronic.
You wont address the other things because you know you can't argue against them.
I didn't address them because they were stupid, you are an acknowledged troll, and I didn't believe you thought they were good arguments. My error.
Your cherry picking and avoid the the actual subject at hand is just your way of staying in fantasy land.
The actual subject at hand is that you rely on bigotry rather than reality.
No they dont have different steroid clasess, genius, but athletes are protected from people taking exogenous hormones and altering their hormones and body chemistry.
Athletes with asthma/allergies can take steroids prescribed for the asthma/allergies, altering their body chemistry. Insulin is a hormone taken by athletes with type I diabetes to alther their body chemistry. Transgender athletes also take hormones to alter their body chemistry. The difference is that, for transgender women, these hormone remove their muscle amss, make them weaker and easier for cisgender woman to compete against.
Essentially people are forbidden from becoming more man like to avoid people getting hurt.
Taking steroids does not make you "more man like", unless you have a childish view of what a man is.
You know, kinda like men entering contests against women.
You have yet to provide proof of "getting hurt", except the hurt to your tiny view of reality.
You did notice that your videos did nothing to support your claims that cisgender women are being hurt by competing with transgender women?