Also wasn't a conviction right? (i dont think there was but cant remember)
Im not exactly sure how im supposed to think about someone who is accused of something but not convicted. I can imagine a scenario where someone wants to get rich and makes an accusation about a rich person in the hopes that they get paid off as a result of the accusation.
I have no idea what actually happened in the kobe scenario.
The bridges scenario I at least know a good portion of what happened. I still dont know what led to/provoked the assault but I do know that the assault occurred. I feel confident in saying that Bridges is a big old douchebag.