The official "let's impeach Trump" thread




LogGrad98

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Here we are again.

It's not going to happen. They are not in session and there are enough slimeballs in the house that a call for impeachment will never happen. Everyone supporting this ************ needs to go to jail. Period. They are supporting a seditionist and a traitor to his country. That should be viewed as collusion.

Man I wish Romney had run in 2016. Imagine how much better off we would have been with Romney in the Whitehouse the last 4 years.
 

colton

All Around Nice Guy
Staff member
It's not going to happen. They are not in session and there are enough slimeballs in the house that a call for impeachment will never happen.

Actually I think it will happen. Trump's going to be impeached a second time, albeit only for a fraction of the things that he SHOULD be impeached for. Very likely not convicted though.
 

Red

Well-Known Member
Actually I think it will happen. Trump's going to be impeached a second time, albeit only for a fraction of the things that he SHOULD be impeached for. Very likely not convicted though.
“Incitement of Insurrection”. Let him live that down.

 

The Thriller

Well-Known Member
It's not going to happen. They are not in session and there are enough slimeballs in the house that a call for impeachment will never happen. Everyone supporting this ************ needs to go to jail. Period. They are supporting a seditionist and a traitor to his country. That should be viewed as collusion.

Man I wish Romney had run in 2016. Imagine how much better off we would have been with Romney in the Whitehouse the last 4 years.
He would’ve never won the primary. He would’ve fallen just like Cruz, bush, etc. the base didn’t want a moderate. It still doesn’t! The base still craves angry white grievance. Romney wouldn’t have provided them with that.
 

Jeditiger

Hoppy Goodness
Contributor
He is going to be the first president to be impeached twice! The article will be introduced on Monday and voted on on Wednesday. It's virtually a lock to pass, IMO. The senate won't take it up until 1/20. This is because the senate is in "pro-forma" session until the inauguration. And while McConnel can call for a session to take up the article, it takes only 1 GOP senator to veto the call for a senate session while in "pro-forma". So, the new Schumer-led senate will have to take it up. And why should they take it up after Trump is gone? Because there is still a good chance for conviction (2/3's of senators *present* to convict), and if convicted, it only takes a simple majority senate vote to prevent Trump from ever holding public office again. That makes it worth it.
 

colton

All Around Nice Guy
Staff member

That doesn't surprise me. Personally I don't think Trump's Capitol riot speech will be held criminally liable. (But it is impeachable. )

But his call to the GA Sec of State pressuring him to somehow find the exact number of votes needed for him to win the state--now that is criminal in my opinion, both by state and federal statutes.
 

leftyjace

Well-Known Member
For those watching the House "debates" on this...
Anyone hearing anything at all edifying?
I'm not.
The best remarks were by the Minority leader... I do not agree with his perspective, but he was eloquent and had many good points - on top of acknowledging that the riots were the fault of the President.
Any other thoughts?
 

LogGrad98

Well-Known Member
Contributor

I know there has been talk of holding the trial sometime after Biden’s first hundred days, but I have also read that that would be unconstitutional....
It isn't clearly defined in the constitution and there is precedent.



Btw this guy's channel is really good. He manages to maintain a certain level of balance even when his own opinions are clear. He does a great job breaking down the legal aspects for the masses to make it very understandable. Highly recommended.
 
Last edited:

Red

Well-Known Member
It isn't clearly defined in the constitution and there is precedent.

Thanks. This is the article I had read. Obviously, I don’t really know the correct answer to this, but would not be surprised if the Supreme Court had to decide on whether a trial or not.


“The Constitution itself answers this question clearly: No, he cannot be. Once Trump’s term ends on Jan. 20, Congress loses its constitutional authority to continue impeachment proceedings against him — even if the House has already approved articles of impeachment.

Therefore, if the House of Representatives were to impeach the president before he leaves office, the Senate could not thereafter convict the former president and disqualify him under the Constitution from future public office.

The reason for this is found in the Constitution itself. Trump would no longer be incumbent in the Office of the President at the time of the delayed Senate proceeding and would no longer be subject to “impeachment conviction” by the Senate, under the Constitution’s Impeachment Clauses. Which is to say that the Senate’s only power under the Constitution is to convict — or not — an incumbent president.
 

colton

All Around Nice Guy
Staff member
Thanks. This is the article I had read. Obviously, I don’t really know the correct answer to this, but would not be surprised if the Supreme Court had to decide on whether a trial or not.


“The Constitution itself answers this question clearly: No, he cannot be. Once Trump’s term ends on Jan. 20, Congress loses its constitutional authority to continue impeachment proceedings against him — even if the House has already approved articles of impeachment.

Therefore, if the House of Representatives were to impeach the president before he leaves office, the Senate could not thereafter convict the former president and disqualify him under the Constitution from future public office.

The reason for this is found in the Constitution itself. Trump would no longer be incumbent in the Office of the President at the time of the delayed Senate proceeding and would no longer be subject to “impeachment conviction” by the Senate, under the Constitution’s Impeachment Clauses. Which is to say that the Senate’s only power under the Constitution is to convict — or not — an incumbent president.
That's incorrect. At least, it's certainly not "clear". Most experts I've heard/read feel like it would be permissible.
 

fishonjazz

Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
I totally understand why people want to impeach him again. I get that it prevents him from running again in 2024 and he loses a number of other benefits as well. I get that he needs to be held responsible.

But...... The chances of the senate voting to convict is small (I think. Maybe I'm wrong here).

His supporters will only see this as another biased attack from the left and will be emboldened and angrier than ever and will never allow Biden to have a chance to do anything right in their eyes (admittedly this might be the case anyway)
Another impeachment trial will keep Trump on the front page of everything and his stupid fat *** shadow will envelop the country for even longer.

I would like to just let him fade away as much as possible and with another impeachment trial that won't happen. I think his supporters will see this as making Trump's legend even larger than ever before.

I'm against impeachment.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 

The Thriller

Well-Known Member
I totally understand why people want to impeach him again. I get that it prevents him from running again in 2024 and he loses a number of other benefits as well. I get that he needs to be held responsible.

But...... The chances of the senate voting to convict is small (I think. Maybe I'm wrong here).

His supporters will only see this as another biased attack from the left and will be emboldened and angrier than ever and will never allow Biden to have a chance to do anything right in their eyes (admittedly this might be the case anyway)
Another impeachment trial will keep Trump on the front page of everything and his stupid fat *** shadow will envelop the country for even longer.

I would like to just let him fade away as much as possible and with another impeachment trial that won't happen. I think his supporters will see this as making Trump's legend even larger than ever before.

I'm against impeachment.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
That's forever on Senate Republicans if they fail to convict. But when facing evil you need to stand up. Trump deserves to be impeached and convicted. The Legislative branch needs to show that it still has a spine. Otherwise, the constitution is just a piece of paper and the next dictator will continue to test the fences.
 

Top