Tha
thats because you’re a conservative.
There's kind of an interesting throughline with the "deplorables" thing. Because that obviously made a certain segment of the Trump Train identify with Trump more.
One of the Zizek books talks about a tendency in "rightist ideology" (not specifically Republican) to offer weakness or guilt as the identifying characteristic that causes people to align themselves with the leader of the party. As a result, when people point out the moral or temperamental flaw it actually is counter productive - it only makes people feel like the problematic figure is MORE like them and therefore more sympathetic.
For the Nazi party, the best example is Hitler's outbursts of rage - and specifically impotent rage. Those public performances were something that people recognized in themselves, and were therefore not disqualifying.
The other memorable example was Austrian politics in the 1980's, in which Kurt Waldheim pointedly refused to grapple with his past work as a Nazi intelligence officer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Waldheim
Political opponents tried to use this against him. But so much of the country had its own history of complicity with Nazi occupation that it was essentially a facet of the civil society that the country would never have an honest reckoning with its social and political history. A significant percentage of the populace could not, existentially, bring themselves to disqualify Waldheim because that would imply they had to do a reckoning of their own.
I see a lot of parallels with how race, gender, and white supremacy works in America and the appeal of Trump among those who voluntarily took on the "deplorable" label. A victory for Trump is a ratification of the idea that there will never be a reckoning. The appeal is personal and Trump is a symbolic object that people over-identify with. Everything else doesn't matter.