It is. There couldn’t be named a worse trade (of players, not prospects) in franchise history.No spin?
Gotta be the worst trade in the history of the Jazz if Locke can't even spin it.
It is. There couldn’t be named a worse trade (of players, not prospects) in franchise history.No spin?
Gotta be the worst trade in the history of the Jazz if Locke can't even spin it.
It depends... you think another team giving us a 1st for Vando? If they were discussing and it was a 23 first with Shamet/Crowder for Bogey I would think an alternative scenario would be Bogey/Vando for Crowder/Dario and a 24 first (top 4 protected).Yeah Suns are on drugs if they thought they were getting Vando and Bogey for a 1st.
We only take on salary for mediocre prospects that go through the Lakers hype machine.The Jazz will have to take back future salary if they want more picks. That doesnt seem like an objective for them currently.
Just keep Vanderbilt. See what we got. He has some interesting abilities.It depends... you think another team giving us a 1st for Vando? If they were discussing and it was a 23 first with Shamet/Crowder for Bogey I would think an alternative scenario would be Bogey/Vando for Crowder/Dario and a 24 first (top 4 protected).
We did a team building move for a tank season that saves the owner some cash. Doesn't push forward our two main objectives which are getting a top 5 pick this year and building the long term asset base.
2 years is a long time, no sense in selling low at least.*and I know the response will be Vanderbilt can leave in 2 years gasp*
Yeah Suns are on drugs if they thought they were getting Vando and Bogey for a 1st.
I like Vando... this would be selling high on him. He was in an ideal situation last year for his skill set. I think his warts will be more obvious with us.2 years is a long time, no sense in selling low at least.