I feel like any NY deal that doesn't include RJ should be a non-starter.If by less you mean more then yes because that means more picks.
I would want RJ and 4 1st round unprotected picks.I feel like any NY deal that doesn't include RJ should be a non-starter.
lolI feel like any NY deal that doesn't include RJ should be a non-starter.
I feel like any NY deal that doesn't include RJ should be a non-starter.
I'd pack Don's bags myself.You wouldn’t do 6 1sts, 3 pick swaps and Toppin + Quickley?
I thought that too but we could potentially get 6 god damn picks back. That’s 10 total accumulated picks this off-season. And Quickly and Toppin along with that is still a win. Beasley, Bev, Vanderbilt, Kessler, Bomaro, And 10 picks plus our own presumably our own top 3-5 pick next year and possible top ten pick in 24. I’m good with all that.I feel like any NY deal that doesn't include RJ should be a non-starter.
Well, now that you mention it, that is acceptable provided that at least 4 picks are unprotected.You wouldn’t do 6 1sts, 3 pick swaps and Toppin + Quickley?
Plus, hopefully picks for Bogey, Conley and Clarkson. Also, in this scenario, I’d absolutely try to trade Beverley, Beasley and whoever we get from the Knicks as well.I thought that too but we could potentially get 6 god damn picks back. That’s 10 total accumulated picks this off-season. And Quickly and Toppin along with that is still a win. Beasley, Bev, Vanderbilt, Kessler, Bomaro, And 10 picks plus our own presumably our own top 3-5 pick next year and possible top ten pick in 24. I’m good with all that.
Plus, hopefully picks for Bogey, Conley and Clarkson. Also, in this scenario, I’d absolutely try to trade Beverley, Beasley and whoever we get from the Knicks as well.
Scorched Earth.
Yep, we need to get as many picks we can to get a cumulative high % for #1 if we can.
![]()
Beverly should garner a mid-late 1st in a trade. Same as Royce, imo.