What's new
By:

What Utah going to the Pac does to rivalries

//r00t 4 Jazz said:
How's the sword fight comming? j/k
How about as a secondary bet to address this manhood, each of you could predict the score and who ever is closer wins this secondary bet, there are variations of this as well like adding the total score up for example, just thought I'd throw it out there since during this lil' sword fight each others sack size came in question.
Click to expand...

I'll put a stop to this and just take the prize for biggest sack. Ask bigb/catratcho.
 
I'm not so sure I think bigb would have to under go further testing to prove this, we would need to see the said markings on his chin at the very least.
 
//r00t 4 Jazz said:
I'm not so sure I think bigb would have to under go further testing to prove this, we would need to see the said markings on his chin at the very least.
Click to expand...

It's like Viggo Mortenson and the canyon on his chin.

viggo-mortensen-20040906-9298.jpg


I said I was sorry.
 
SaltyDawg said:
I don't know how I could be more clear... TCU and Utah are the 2 favorites to win the MWC this year. TCU and Utah would also be the 2 favorites to win the PAC this year. There is no TCU in the PAC, so if Utah was already in the PAC, they would be the favorite this year. It's not delusional. You know what's delusional? Some bitter BYU fan who keeps saying Utah wouldn't and won't contend for a PAC championship, but refuses to list the teams that will- even after being asked to do so repeatedly.
Click to expand...
Holy freaking ****, you are a complete moron! I never said you'd never compete for a championship in the PAC.
***pauses typing to re-read thread***
In fact, here's exactly what I said in post #79 of this very same thread:
catratcho said:
To tell you you my opinion on it, I think Utah will be in the top 1/3 of the new PAC just about every year, with a shot at winning it some years. My only point was that I don't think this next year (2010) is one of those years.
Click to expand...
But to answer your question, I think either USC or Oregon could be the winners this year. Do both have HUGE question marks this year? Yes. Does Utah have HUGE question marks this year? Yes. That simple.
Am I bitter? Maybe a little. Am I jealous? Hell yes. Do I think you're a delusional homer? Double hell yes.
 
catratcho said:
Holy freaking ****, you are a complete moron! I never said you'd never compete for a championship in the PAC.
***pauses typing to re-read thread***
In fact, here's exactly what I said in post #79 of this very same thread:

But to answer your question, I think either USC or Oregon could be the winners this year. Do both have HUGE question marks this year? Yes. Does Utah have HUGE question marks this year? Yes. That simple.
Am I bitter? Maybe a little. Am I jealous? Hell yes. Do I think you're a delusional homer? Double hell yes.
Click to expand...

Well if you think USC and Oregon are so much better than Utah that I'm delusional for not agreeing, then I hate to tell you but I am not the delusional one. Just about every article I have seen on the subject said Utah is expected to compete in the PAC from day 1. I posted at least one link (possibly more but I can't remember for sure if I posted more than 1) so it isn't just me being a homer.

By the way, I know what you said. If you read my post, you will see that I found it odd that you said Utah would compete in the future but NOT this year. I was saying I could understand you saying in the future they will fall off, but right now they are as good as any team in the PAC.

USC and Oregon? LOL, we'll see how those teams do this year. Oregon was the experts' pick until they kicked Masoli (the starting QB) off the team. USC is just crazy talk though. They weren't good enough to win it last year, and this year their team is getting picked apart with all the good players looking to transfer, and the scholorships being reduced.

You just picked USC and Oregon as teams that are better than Utah this season, and called me a delusional moron in the same post. LOL, too funny.
 
SaltyDawg said:
They weren't good enough to win it last year, and this year their team is getting picked apart with all the good players looking to transfer, and the scholorships being reduced.
Click to expand...

Remember that Potson guy that couldn't hack it at USC and then started at Utah for a couple of years? Yeah, I think they are probably deep enough to handle a few players leaving, especially since you guys aren't even going to see them for at least one more year. Give Barkley and Baxter a year to come together and you guys are dead. USC's got a great fight song though - you'll learn to love it.
 
You just picked USC and Oregon as teams that are better than Utah this season, and called me a delusional moron in the same post. LOL, too funny.
Click to expand...

Oregon wont hurt that much for losing masoli. He was the least talented quarter back on their team. Oregon has more talent on their kickoff team than Utah has on their whole team. The only reason that Utah was close to Oregon last year is they did not take Utah seriously. This year every team in the pac-10 would push Utah every game. Utah can win one big game but playing better teams week in and week out utah's lack of depth will show up. utah will get better as recruiting takes off.
 
Broncster said:
Oregon wont hurt that much for losing masoli. He was the least talented quarter back on their team. Oregon has more talent on their kickoff team than Utah has on their whole team. The only reason that Utah was close to Oregon last year is they did not take Utah seriously. This year every team in the pac-10 would push Utah every game. Utah can win one big game but playing better teams week in and week out utah's lack of depth will show up. utah will get better as recruiting takes off.
Click to expand...

SHHHHHHH.... let them run their mouths and be the arrogant bunch of drunk-tards that they are. It is so much more satisfying to rub it in after the fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top