To single it out in this thread seeamoungst everything ms rather nit picky and a waste of time. I never said it was your fault so nice try but come on man...
Will there be American invasion in Syria?
- Thread starter MVP
- Start date
To single it out in this thread seeamoungst everything ms rather nit picky and a waste of time. I never said it was your fault so nice try but come on man...
Unfortunately. But which one sounds more logical?
Both. Each of them have very good reasons to try and keep the other happy.
Of course I cannot. Why would NATO do that in such a way a regular guy like me could prove easily. It's just an opinion when I'm talking like they did this and that etc. But it's not of course a biased opinion or a fanaticism. Maybe Syria news wasn't big like todays in US before the lately days but we were living with it here in Turkey over the last two years as it's a war possibility next to us that could include our people. Even, we already lost more than 100 lives for this ****.
It's all either an unnamed Arab intelligence official or a rebel commander getting treatment inside of Turkey's borders or a journalist's report from the area after talking with the key guys from the both sides. Claims, statements, articles, interviews are/were far too many to ignore. But it's just in Turkish most of the time and won't be on the mainstream media obviously. Plus maybe they are not Nato branded equipment or armings or may not be sent from directly Nato's warehouses but at the end, Turkey is a Nato member and it's no secret we did hell of an aid to the rebels, Erdoğan has been accused by this countless times but he has never denied any of it, hell, he even defended it.
And none of the western countries have warned Turkey seriously.
Austria 1938?
So you cannot prove it. Ok. Still interesting though and I don't doubt that many of the weapons are either russian or "western" in origin.
D - Day
addictionary
Well-Known Member
Do you know what the rebels said inside Turkish borders? "We are grateful to the AKP (The anti-secular political party in power in Turkey for the last 10 years) and Erdoğan"
And then the bomb exploded in Hatay (Turkish Border city to Syria) and the victims in there that survived told the unofficial media (since the ****ing government banned the news on the issue. I bet they are behind it) that those so called rebels threaten them that they will kill them and take their homes all the time since they entered. If there was any kind of intention towards democracy and human rights, those are the first to drop alongside Beşar Esad.
And then the bomb exploded in Hatay (Turkish Border city to Syria) and the victims in there that survived told the unofficial media (since the ****ing government banned the news on the issue. I bet they are behind it) that those so called rebels threaten them that they will kill them and take their homes all the time since they entered. If there was any kind of intention towards democracy and human rights, those are the first to drop alongside Beşar Esad.
I can't. But maybe it is provable and someone could do, I can't know.
addictionary
Well-Known Member
Not possible unless you are a Wikileaks agent or something. NATO declared to stay out of it when supporting Turkey fairly. But they approved the Patriot missiles to set along the Turkish border of Syria. Nobrainer they are onto it and assigning agents, commanders and trainers to the region to aid them.
https://news.yahoo.com/kerry-rejects-assads-30-day-timetable-180018987--politics.html
Assad be all "30 days, no problem. A#1 middle east country!"
And Kerry be all "30 days? I can take care of the rebels, install a democratic government, and still have time to do my holiday shopping in 30 days"
Now awaiting Syrian/Russian response.
Assad be all "30 days, no problem. A#1 middle east country!"
And Kerry be all "30 days? I can take care of the rebels, install a democratic government, and still have time to do my holiday shopping in 30 days"
Now awaiting Syrian/Russian response.
I took it as 30 days to have the job done. Not a begin to report on what they have let alone try and transfer control or dismantle the chemical weapons timeframe. To be honest I agree with Kerry here. This is good idea but make them commit and not use it as a stall tactic.
But the last thing I want is to go into Syria.
We're kind of on the same page.. the last thing I want is anyone to use chemical weapons. But the end to that if someone is using them, is us going in. It's one in the same.
The article says:
So yeah, I totally support saying "that's not good enough". I mean, what exactly does it take to start transmitting data about your weapons? All you gotta do to start it is start up a conference call and be like "Yo homies, These are here, those are there.. we're still working on the rest".
Now to be done in 30 days, as in give all weapons, and information about weapons in thirty days.. that's reasonable. I'd like to see two-three weeks, but if it's actually DONE to the fullest imagined extent, although I don't like it I'd live with it.
Either way we look at it, the balls in Syria's court.