Will there be American invasion in Syria?

[Deleted member 848]

It amuses me how much people harp on Fox News. It is no worse than Huffington Post or MSNBC and they are widely used here without comment. Which is fine and proper. The obvious bias just amuses me.

I suppose they both use their respective methods of slanging the truth. It's just that Fox borders on racism lots, and it really ****ing irks me

 

[Stoked]

Now mind you, we have no public plans to attack. So to diffuse this situation all we have to say is "Well, we didn't make plans. We just said we were going to if you don't comply, dorkus". And then be like "Ok, sure, we'll stop arming the rebels"(even though there's a 2.5 month delay, so they'll still be getting weapons for another two months). The third might be a little complicated....

We shouldn't, as it was never a negotiation to get him to stop using chemical weapons. He will stop, one way or another. And if another middle eastern country decides they want to use chemical weapons, we'll do the same thing to them.

I feel like this was the worst move Assad could have made. Kerry and Lavrov felt like they were on the same page, and then boom. There goes the world.

I disagree. The US obviously has plans to attack Syria. They have moved assets into the region, had a Senate commite approve a strike, had a speach by the President laying out the case for a strike and had a looming senate and house vote. It is very obvious that we are/were going to strike.

Hell Kerry was even floating the idea that the President did not need congress approval to strike Syria.

 

[Stoked]

I suppose they both use their respective methods of slanging the truth. It's just that Fox borders on racism lots, and it really ****ing irks me

So does MSNBC. In my opinion they are far worse than Fox in the racism dept. Anytime anyone disagrees with the President on any issue for any reason MSNBC hosts and guests will drop charges of racism.

In principle hate and disdain based on party affiliation is no better than hate based on race. I am not claiming they have the same history so relax One Brow.

 

[Deleted member 848]

So does MSNBC. In my opinion they are far worse than Fox in the racism dept. Anytime anyone disagrees with the President on any issue for any reason MSNBC hosts and guests will drop charges of racism.

That's not racism.

In principle hate and disdain based on party affiliation is no better than hate based on race. I am not claiming they have the same history so relax One Brow.

Did I say one was worse than the other? I was simply giving my perspective on why I PERSONALLY think Fox is worse.



Don't get too jumpy, mon ami.

 

[Deleted member 848]

And I suppose your statement makes sense in principle, but we all know that racism is a much bigger deal than disliking a party. 'In principle', communism is the perfect political system

 

[Stoked]

That's not racism.



Did I say one was worse than the other? I was simply giving my perspective on why I PERSONALLY think Fox is worse.



Don't get too jumpy, mon ami.

Using MSNBCs arguement: If a non white says it than its racist and if a white does so than they are an Uncle Tom.

I'm not jumpy. We are good. Over at MSNBC the automatically assume you are racist, bible thumping, gun loving, unsympathetic...

That is no different in principal than thinking that a member of the opposite race is a certain way just based on race.

Also I said racism dept. Not racism. I'd go so far as to say 80% of what MSNBC labels racism is not.

But yes Fox news has its idiots. For example Hannity. Guy should be kicked off TV and radio for ever. He is a political hack and is a disgusting sham.

 

[Stoked]

And I suppose your statement makes sense in principle, but we all know that racism is a much bigger deal than disliking a party. 'In principle', communism is the perfect political system

Yes racism is the bigger problem, history alone tells you that.

Edit: I can tell you that people are getting pretty damn sick of being labeled racist if they disagree with anything the President says or does.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Using MSNBCs arguement: If a non white says it than its racist and if a white does so than they are an Uncle Tom.

I'm not jumpy. We are good. Over at MSNBC the automatically assume you are racist, bible thumping, gun loving, unsympathetic...

I don't think I said anything that negates this. And thats because its a valid point. I think I've watched 20 minutes of MSNBC in the last year

That is no different in principal than thinking that a member of the opposite race is a certain way just based on race.

What this is boiling down to, is that you think racism is equally bad to people accusing others of being racist. I simply disagree-- and it would be too long and drawn out for me to explain why.

Also I said racism dept. Not racism. I'd go so far as to say 80% of what MSNBC labels racism is not.

But yes Fox news has its idiots. For example Hannity. Guy should be kicked off TV and radio for ever. He is a political hack and is a disgusting sham.

I cannot name very many Faux journalists that I enjoy. Whether its that blonde, Beck, O'Reilly-- they all seem the same to me.

 

[Stoked]

I don't think I said anything that negates this. And thats because its a valid point. I think I've watched 20 minutes of MSNBC in the last year




What this is boiling down to, is that you think racism is equally bad to people accusing others of being racist. I simply disagree-- and it would be too long and drawn out for me to explain why.




I cannot name very many Faux journalists that I enjoy. Whether its that blonde, Beck, O'Reilly-- they all seem the same to me.

Obviously racism can be worse. But you are seeing a horrendous trend of attacking the moral character of of a person just because they disagree. Where do you think that road leads?

 

[babe]

Let Allah sort this out.

And why not?

Allah doesn't exist? The Book says Jesus will.

But if Jesus doesn't exist/doesn't care, we could at least stop arming western-style ideologues pretending to be Islamic Fundamentalists. Especially when the methods they use are straight outta communist handbooks for fomenting discord and insinuating control cells into the conflict they are creating on both sides.

American taxpayers oughtta be about done with financing these games through our "intelligence" agencies, and supplying the arms to both sides.

 

[Stoked]

I don't want this to trend into race anyways.

Back to Syria.

 

[Harambe]

I disagree. The US obviously has plans to attack Syria. They have moved assets into the region, had a Senate commite approve a strike, had a speach by the President laying out the case for a strike and had a looming senate and house vote. It is very obvious that we are/were going to strike.

Hell Kerry was even floating the idea that the President did not need congress approval to strike Syria.

But the only way to prove we have/had plans is to expose your own espionage

Sent from your moms room.... While she was sleeping.