Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Gameface, Jan 19, 2019.

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

  1. Yes

    82.1%
  2. No

    17.9%
  1. Zombie

    Zombie Well-Known Member

    4,951
    3,200
    268
    Dec 20, 2011


    Seems fairly cut and dry to me.
     
    colton, Gameface and str8line like this.
  2. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    Such BS that this coward Muller refuses to answer the questions. This guy is hiding on the fraud he and his staff committed.


    Uh uh uh. Im not gonna get into that. Uh uh uh. Im not gonna get into that. Uh uh uh uh. Im not gonna get into that.

    What a ****ing charade. No you ****ing clown get into it. Lets hear the truth you ****ing bitch.
     
  3. Red

    Red Well-Known Member

    3,437
    1,041
    178
    Mar 17, 2015
    I don't know, but Schiff was much better prepared, and basically much more info damaging to Trump emerged from the Intell hearing. I have no idea what effect, if any, it will have on the electorate, but in terms of drawing Mueller out, way better to see the day long hearings end with Schiff and Intell, then Nadler and Judiciary.
     
    The Thriller likes this.
  4. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    All these cowardly Democrats claim to want to know the truth but when it comes down to it then they really dont because they know this has all been a fraud.
     
  5. Red

    Red Well-Known Member

    3,437
    1,041
    178
    Mar 17, 2015
    Have you been following along these past 2 1/2 years? It's Mueller.
     
  6. Zombie

    Zombie Well-Known Member

    4,951
    3,200
    268
    Dec 20, 2011
    I just watched that. Really got to the heart of the whole thing.
     
    The Thriller and Red like this.
  7. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    Hell ya.

    Check out this ribbing.

    Republicans tearing Muller a new one.


     
    DasJazz likes this.
  8. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    When you engage in fraud and injustice on the american people and the president for political reasons then you are a coward and a punk.

    I dont care how his name is spellled he is a traitor to his country.
     
  9. Zombie

    Zombie Well-Known Member

    4,951
    3,200
    268
    Dec 20, 2011
    Decorated Marine Veteran

    "Coward"

    Sure, see how far that gets you.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2019
  10. Red

    Red Well-Known Member

    3,437
    1,041
    178
    Mar 17, 2015
    True. His surname was originally Drumpf, and he did behave in a treasonous manner. And, he was a coward. His daddy paid a doctor to get him out of Vietnam.
     
    JazzGal, LogGrad98 and fishonjazz like this.
  11. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    You only care about serviceman when it serves you. The Democrats are known for disrespecting the military all the time. So nice try.

    You can be brave at one point in your life and then turn into a cowardly treasonous traitor. Which is exactly who Muller is now.
     
  12. Zombie

    Zombie Well-Known Member

    4,951
    3,200
    268
    Dec 20, 2011
    Troll harder.
     
    fishonjazz likes this.
  13. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,653
    10,233
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    str8line, Zombie and NPC D4617 like this.
  14. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
     
  15. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    Jesus. This is painful to watch.

    Muller doesnt even know whats going on

     
  16. str8line

    str8line Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner

    7,104
    2,029
    263
    Nov 22, 2013
    Does it ever get old being Trump''s tampon?
    Sent from my SM-G930V using JazzFanz mobile app
     
    fishonjazz likes this.
  17. Red

    Red Well-Known Member

    3,437
    1,041
    178
    Mar 17, 2015
    Well, guess we shouldn't let this bs slide.

    I knew your take indicated you had not been following the lead up to Mueller's testimony. I decided to dig up some evidence as to those developments, involving Barr's letter to Mueller:

    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/22/justice-mueller-congress-testimony-limit-1426035

    So, blame the lackey AG Barr for limiting what Mueller could talk about.

    Mueller's opening statement refers to the letter AG Barr sent him just days ago, in his second point. Your take is built on your Deep State fiction. Or it's built on a fondness for trolling during peak news cycles...

    In a prepared statement at the beginning of his testimony, the special counsel explained why he would not be able to answer many questions to members of the House Judiciary Committee.

    “First, public testimony could affect several ongoing matters. In some of these matters, court rules or judicial orders limit the disclosure of information to protect the fairness of the proceedings. And consistent with longstanding Justice Department policy, it would be inappropriate for me to comment in any way that could affect an ongoing matter,” Mueller said, according to his prepared remarks.

    “Second, the Justice Department has asserted privileges concerning investigative information and decisions, ongoing matters within the Justice Department, and deliberations within our office. These are Justice Department privileges that I will respect. The Department has released the letter discussing the restrictions on my testimony.”

    “I am unable to address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called ‘Steele Dossier,’” he said, because the FBI continues to investigate.

    “As I stated in May, I also will not comment on the actions of the Attorney General or of Congress. I was appointed as a prosecutor, and I intend to adhere to that role and to the Department’s standards that govern it.”

    https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article233055477.html
     
    colton likes this.
  18. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    Nah I get it Red.

    Funny how now it makes sense to follow laws.

    When the Mueller report was redacted for the same reasons you and all the other Democrats threw fits and complained too.

    Isnt this fun?
     
  19. Catchall

    Catchall Well-Known Member 2019 Prediction Contest Winner

    20,518
    2,821
    263
    May 27, 2010
    I've gone through the first session with the Judiciary Committee. Mueller seemed like he didn't want to be there and was barely familiar with the report his name is attached to. In fairness, he had a huge team at the FBI, and now he's being made a figurehead for the whole Bureau.

    Mueller wouldn't touch anything to do with the origins of the FBI's Russia probe or the counter-intelligence against the Trump campaign staff, since it's apparently still under investigation by the Justice Department.

    Morning session confirms that Mueller "did not exonerate" the president, something we already knew. Not sure any new substance has come out for me yet. The Dems on the committee just basically want to take a highlighter to things in the report.

    Will watch the Intel Committee hearing.
     
    NPC D4617 likes this.
  20. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,348
    2,581
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    This deserves a standing ovation.
     

Share This Page