hmmm....
I'm looking for the "falsifiable" element in this conspiracy theory. ya know?
Like Einstein's theory, which has some falsifiable aspects which have in fact been proven false. So far, scientists haven't just thrown it all out. Just don't want to. Too many nice babies in that bath water. Like Newton's laws, Einstein's are immensely useful in practical terms for the domain where they apply. And the "out there" stuff just lets us know it's not gonna be useful "out there" and we still have stuff we need to know.
Pretty much the same with Evolution, which if you go back and actually read Darwin you can hardly believe any of it. But it is still a useful blanket that supports..... or covers...... a lot of stuff people want to do that with. And the alternative hypothesis (The Bible) is nothing but a metaphor and gives no useful information for understanding nature.
circular logic covers most human reason, still.
Too damn easy to do a smartass video like this without one specific fact on board.
The reason I reject this thread's thesis is more to do with exaggeration/extrapolation/sheer inflammatory rhetoric. It's not posed as something to generate discussion or intellectual efforts to deal with issues. It's calling people "killers" and ****. NO respect for the reality of all the measures being taken to be humane, responsible, and effective.
I know there are some who look at the new vaccine technology as a tool where other genetic material could be included along with the viral material that is for causing the immune system to develop full immunity, but the full mDNA or MRNA is being reported, and can quickly be determined by thousands of independent labs. It is also being fully reported when reactions occur because so damn many people are interested to be at the front of those reports if there are reactions.
older vaccine technologies have reactions rates, disease transmission rates, mortality rates too. Just not nearly the rates resulting from not using the vaccines.
We accept vaccine rates that are 1/1000th the disease rates generally. Even 1/100 for more severe diseases. Offhand, considering the statistics, we are pretty effective with these vaccines being very beneficial with probably 1/10000 negative results for a disease that for vulnerable people is pretty deadly.
And we do stuff for the people who suffer anything from the vaccine. Or should. Just part of the overall cost/benefit decision.