Wrong thread broFavors with a reliable 3-point shot > Anything Kanter could become in even a fringe reality
Wrong thread broFavors with a reliable 3-point shot > Anything Kanter could become in even a fringe reality
No, because competent teams have no problems both pack the paint and challenge 3pt shots at the same time. It's not 90-00's any longer. You need to be able to be drive hard when 3pt shot is challenged.
No, because competent teams have no problems both pack the paint and challenge 3pt shots at the same time. It's not 90-00's any longer. You need to be able to be drive hard when 3pt shot is challenged.
Wrong thread bro
Favors with a reliable 3-point shot > Anything Kanter could become in even a fringe reality
To be fair you could say "If kanter had reliable defensive presence > Favors"
There is a sea of difference between "terrifying" for defenses and "need to cover more ground". Pay attention to what exactly is being argued. For most teams Favors shooting threes is no different to defending BookerThey would have to extend their defense further than they need to currently. If you don't think that results in more space (and more ground to cover for the defense) than you are very likely mentally challenged.
There is a sea of difference between "terrifying" for defenses and "need to cover more ground". Pay attention to what exactly is being argued. For most teams Favors shooting threes is no different to defending Booker
We have to get every inch of spacing possible with Gobert on the floor, so it's a big deal. Not for his game, but just for the spacing of the offense.