What's new
By:

2020 Presidential election

Zombie said:
There's no reason to believe Sander's presidency would or even could tank the economy, so that's exactly what you are saying.
Click to expand...
Maybe he is saying that Sanders becomes president. Sanders is kind of seen as anti rich/pro poor (no idea if this is true but I think he is seen in that light). The rich (who control the money) **** things up intentionally in a form of protest for us electing a dude who would try to even up the wealth inequality a bit.

Idk but I think Wes is somewhat correct that the economy could take a hit from Sanders being elected. And Wes isn't even close to the first person to float that idea. I have heard it a lot.

I like Bernie a lot btw

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Red said:
Hmm. Bloomberg is considering Hillary as his running mate.

https://www.the-sun.com/news/407672/bloomberg-hillary-clinton-running-mate-trump-2020/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Hillary-Clinton-running-mate-say-sources.html
Click to expand...

Well, that would kill Bloomberg's chances, assuming he had any. Imagine a brokered convention where Bloomberg gets the nomination and then brings back Hillary. Talk about tone deaf. Bernie supporters might literally riot.

Plus, nothing says Bloomberg is a deep state tool like bringing back Hillary.
 
fishonjazz said:
Maybe he is saying that Sanders becomes president. Sanders is kind of seen as anti rich/pro poor (no idea if this is true but I think he is seen in that light). The rich (who control the money) **** things up intentionally in a form of protest for us electing a dude who would try to even up the wealth inequality a bit.

Idk but I think Wes is somewhat correct that the economy could take a hit from Sanders being elected. And Wes isn't even close to the first person to float that idea. I have heard it a lot.

I like Bernie a lot btw

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

First off I don't really believe that the rich are actually holding the economy hostage, not on purpose anyway. I think Wall Street bankers and their mouthpieces in the media are stoking fears about a Sanders presidency that aren't based in reality.
 
Wes Mantooth said:
He does. Anyone who doesn’t think so isn’t paying attention to what’s been going on and the traction he’s gaining.
Click to expand...
He's got a chance because he's successfully bought his way into making himself indispensable to the DNC, and has a ton of money for ads. He's incredibly weak among the progressive faction of the party and among people of color. He's also got a lot of the same character flaws as Trump, but with a more professional veneer.

As a Bernie supporter I'm perfectly happy with him siphoning support from Buttigieg, Klob and Biden though. It's going to make Sanders path to victory a little easier.
 
Bloomberg comes off as one of the most dull, non-charismatic and arrogant people you could possibly find. His ads are solid, but once he needs to give a speech or respond to questions he'll come off dry as a twig. He's one of the least likable candidates, and that's saying something.

There's a reason he's avoiding the debates and minimizing public appearances.
 
Catchall said:
Bloomberg comes off as one of the most dull, non-charismatic and arrogant people you could possibly find. His ads are solid, but once he needs to give a speech or respond to questions he'll come off dry as a twig. He's one of the least likable candidates, and that's saying something.

There's a reason he's avoiding the debates and minimizing public appearances.
Click to expand...
The reason he hasn’t been in a debate is because thus far he hasn’t been eligible. The next debate is in Las Vegas February 19. Bloomberg needs one more qualifying poll (10 percent support nationally) to be eligible. If he actually qualifies for a debate and refuses to attend, then you can honestly say he’s avoiding a debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top