Part of this comes from not reading it, but it’s not suggesting any of that.But yeah, let's listen to this guy and abandon current measures to deal with this. Maybe he's right and everyone else is wrong.
Part of this comes from not reading it, but it’s not suggesting any of that.But yeah, let's listen to this guy and abandon current measures to deal with this. Maybe he's right and everyone else is wrong.
That’s the thing. Between the half measures (I’d guess more of society is not quarantining than is) and resources which are quickly running out, the curve won’t flatten any time soon imo. If it did, it should in about 7-10 days but I don’t think it will.
I won’t argue because it is impossible to predict. We can extrapolate current models but they do not account for the effectiveness of mitigation and other uncertainties.
I hope u are wrong.
Part of this comes from not reading it, but it’s not suggesting any of that.
The idea of flattening the curve isn’t about reducing total infections, though. Just redistributing them. The exception to that would be if you delay infections long enough for a vaccine.But, social distancing should lead to fewer cases of infection and death, no?
“No, because we won’t be able to isolate ourselves completely or forever. At some stage, we will have to resume a regular routine, and then the R0 will stabilize at 2 again. Effectively, we are delaying the inevitable."
Sure sounds like he doesn't agree with all of us being at home right now.
So in other words, no, you have not heard anyone say what you claim they are saying.The cure is worse than the disease. And yes, there are many people who are saying that the economic hardships outweigh the actions necessary to save lives. And this is precisely what they mean.
And BTW, "the cure is worse than the disease" does not mean what you are saying it does. Have you ever experienced a loved one going through cancer? If you had you would easily be able to understand that term, and you would realize that the meaning is very different than you are suggesting.
So in other words, no, you have not heard anyone say what you claim they are saying.
You obviously didn't suggest that I look there until a separate post that you sent later, and I'm not doing homework that you assign anyway. I think it's meaningless that you ask me to search out some random and anonymous dope who makes a dumb statement. Your original post that I responded to implied that right-to-lifers were now callously suggesting that old people's lives have no value. Your claim remains unsubstantiated. Your quote was made up, just as I had suspected.you obviously didn’t look where I told you to look. Do your homework.
He isnt even left. He didnt support Bernie.You're right.
He **** posts the most biased left stuff he can find, while ignoring everything else even when presented with factual opposition.
He is an ultra-biased partisan. Anyone who can't see that isn't paying attention. And while it's possible to be farther left than he is, that doesn't mean he isn't left.He isnt even left. He didnt support Bernie.
Supporting Joe Biden isn't left. It's right. Your just mad he isn't a far right idiot like you.He is an ultra-biased partisan. Anyone who can't see that isn't paying attention. And while it's possible to be farther left than he is, that doesn't mean he isn't left.