Dont think calling him a career backup as a 24th overall pick equates to calling him a bust, but whatever you need to further your narrative.Confirmation bias against players you said would bust but haven’t lol.
Dont think calling him a career backup as a 24th overall pick equates to calling him a bust, but whatever you need to further your narrative.Confirmation bias against players you said would bust but haven’t lol.
LOL at the narrative call out. "the stats that back up my claim which i sorta back tracked on, are the best stats to use. Not always, just when they, ya know, help my narrative"Dont think calling him a career backup as a 24th overall pick equates to calling him a bust, but whatever you need to further your narrative.
Brother the stats I used proved my point....LOL at the narrative call out. "the stats that back up my claim which i sorta back tracked on, are the best stats to use. Not always, just when they, ya know, help my narrative"
New Lopo
If its the point you want to prove.Brother the stats I used proved my point....
Dont think calling him a career backup as a 24th overall pick equates to calling him a bust, but whatever you need to further your narrative.
Agreed on both parts but you also need to take out the low minute stat anomalies.Yeah, per game isnt as good as a number as % though.
And I wouldnt say it's a 1st vs 2nd stringer thing more than it is an energy thing. If you are playing 20 mpg you should have way more energy to go out and really battle for rebounds vs when you are a starter.
What am I guilty of exactly?If its the point you want to prove.
Dude, sincerely, I plee with you, as a dude thats really liked you for like 15 years or so on this board..........stop being intellectually dishonest. You're WAY too smart to go this route over the last year or so. Its an ego thing, we all have it, but not all are as bright as you are.
I know its hurt you to have people call you out for missing on **** but double, triple and quadrupling down seemingly every single time lately is just so Lopo-esque. You hated it when he did it but now youre taking that torch and its wild/sad.
Yeah, it's weird because WK is considered low minute enough not to be put on the leaderboards, but he's obviously higher minutes than a lot of the low minutes people. Still, you can compare his numbers to historical numbers and it ranks right around average for his size/position.Agreed on both parts but you also need to take out the low minute stat anomalies.
According to that BBall ref list where Kessler is 33rd the top looks like:
#1 Malcolm Hill
#2 Trevor Keels
#3 Andre Drummond
#4 Mfiondu Kabengele
#5 Cole Swinder
Drummond is a legit good rebounder, but for the others....
Meanwhile Sabonis is 18th, Gobert is 20th, Jokic is 35th, Giannis is 43rd and Allen is 46th.
My thoughts on this arent isolated to the WK commentary, but Ill leave it at that and just say Im still a big fan of yours for the record.What am I guilty of exactly?
I called WK a mediocre rebounder and almost immediately said it was probably too strong of a word. Not like I went on weeks rant of trying to prove he was mediocre. I took it back and simply called him average/good, then I pulled the advanced rebounding stats that showed that.
It's really weird yall think I'm some kind of WK hater because I called him a "career backup" early in the process (and have since said I think he's better than that). I'm just calling balls and strikes. To compare me to Lopo who did a much more mental gymnastics version of this on a 3x DPOY player is crazy.