PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
I knew there was something fishy about this story. You purposely left off the 4th infraction.
God Deniers
- Thread starter PearlWatson
- Start date
I knew there was something fishy about this story. You purposely left off the 4th infraction.
Their browser fingerprints show an exact match with an overall uniqueness of one in 3798 or something close to that but I don't remember the exact number. Not too out of the ordinary considering there are millions of computers, but not exactly spelling out coincidence if you ask me.
Now to guess who I meant by "their".
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
This thread is better than I ever imagined.
God Bless Jazzfanz!
God Bless Jazzfanz!
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
Hi! I'm ElRoach0. I don't post in General Discussion very often. While trying to avoid work, I came across this thread. I was reading the thread when I became Ill. At first it was just the chills, then headaches and fatigue kicked in. Slowly but surely I lost my appetite more and more. I went to the doctor, and that's when it happened. I was diagnosed with Retinal Blastoma.
I asked where it came from, and the doctor said that normally it's a naturally occurring phenomenon. However, sometimes it can be contracted from reading abhorrently ignorant posts. And that's when I realized...
I love this strategy of being more outrageous than the thing you are complaining about; thus destroying your "I'm appalled" credibility.
MVP
Well-Known Member
Great article.
https://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/dtung/
https://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/dtung/
The Black Swordsman
Well-Known Member
"If we were able to construct a complete and compelling naturalistic account, the necessity of appealing to God would be diminished." From that article.
This is so not true. All atheists ever do is what Thomas Paine accuses them of doing.
"Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.
It's amazing that atheists can't even say matter is eternal anymore, atheists no longer have a leg to stand on.
Just because you can mathematically find out why something happened doesn't mean that god doesn't exist. When Isaac Newton studied gravity he didn't say "oh I found out god doesn't push you down with his hands"
Science cannot and will not ever explain why something at all exists rather then nothing. Lets say we discover a TOE equation that explains everything. Then why is that TOE that way? If we find a superforce that accounts for all forces what accounts for that superforce?
This is so not true. All atheists ever do is what Thomas Paine accuses them of doing.
"Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.
It's amazing that atheists can't even say matter is eternal anymore, atheists no longer have a leg to stand on.
Just because you can mathematically find out why something happened doesn't mean that god doesn't exist. When Isaac Newton studied gravity he didn't say "oh I found out god doesn't push you down with his hands"
Science cannot and will not ever explain why something at all exists rather then nothing. Lets say we discover a TOE equation that explains everything. Then why is that TOE that way? If we find a superforce that accounts for all forces what accounts for that superforce?
I may have missed this discussion. Link? I'd especially like instructions on how to verify this information myself if possible.
...so that you can cover up your own dupes better?
I've only had one dupe ever. It got busted by Colton in about 3 days. I didn't really bother to try and hide it.
That's what I get for having my dupe makea pass at colton's daughter.
It didn't come from this forum. A little Elvis on my shoulder helped me with it. Even if I told you how it would a) take you forever to cross check everyone & b) is probably no longer possible. Stylometry didn't give any hits either.
Why don't you PM it to me and I'll do with it what I will.
Will you move to Utah & be my lawyer when she sues me? You do realize what this entails, right?
He'll have to compete with "One call. That's all"?
MVP
Well-Known Member
Sure god exists in the minds of people who want to believe in it. Does not make it real though. Same as afterlife, paradise, hell, demons and angels. Numerous people believe in it - that's their choice, not proven fact.
lol, you so funny. So instead of keep looking for answers you want to give up and say it is all on god... You sound like caveman 100.000 years ago who had no clue how lightning and thunder worked and was afraid of it and worshiped god of thunder. Dude, use common sense if you have one. The more and more science discovers and more and more we become educated, the less there is place for god in our life. Just see how people saw and understood things 10.000 years ago, 5.000, 1000, 500, 100 and 10 years ago. Very natural progression of understanding what is what. That's why churches change and change their claims and ideas trying to adjust to scientific discoveries and progress and still fit their god into it. Just read Bible's first two pages, it is such a tale to kids that you can't stop from laughing at nonsense after nonsense it is written there. But obviously people who wrote it 2000 years ago had no clue about evolution, physics, chemistry, biology and astronomy. When you think it starts making sense why they wrote it like that. And it is up to every person to make their own conclusions and either believe it or not. You want to believe it? That's totally fine with me, just do not try to prove something you can't.
A proof that God exists is, theoretically, possible. Say, maybe, God shows up with incontrovertible proofs. . . . .
But it is actually impossible to prove non-existence of anything, in theory or in fact. You can believe it all you want, but you can't prove it. Even things that are mathematically impossible, as a certain electronic transition in the hydrogen electron orbitals that has a zero value and is called, therefore, a "forbidden" event by the math that is predictive of all "allowed" transitions, is seen "out there" in the universe, and measured in astronomical spectroscopy.
To prove God does not exist, you have to test every possible concept of God, including those which define God as being imperceptible or extra-universal. Stupid Russian propagandists made of point to have their first cosmonauts say they looked for God while in Earth orbit, and didn't see Him, and concluded God isn't "there" anywhere in the whole Universe.
Funny how a lot of very smart people are willing to make this case.
"Yesterday while going up the stair, I saw the Man who wasn't there. I saw Him there again today, God I wish you'd go away."
The Black Swordsman
Well-Known Member
It is you who are the caveman 10,000 years ago who doesn't believe in anything outside of 2 miles beyond the cave he was born in. Just because that particular caveman cannot see the other places in the world he doesn't believe in them. Just because you cannot see more then lets say 1500 visible from any given location doesn't mean that other stars do not exist. It is you who is in the cave tied in Plato's allegory of the cave who says that the entirety of existence is a cave with 2d shadow figures.
When Kepler devised the laws of planetary motion his appreciation for the universe of God's creation became even more magnified. Even Albert Einstern (who I admit is a sort of a deist and an agnostic) said "the more I do science the more I believe in god."
This notion that atheists are more scientific then me or other theists is absolute bogus. Here I am with a degree in Biology attending medical school while I have some atheist clamoring that they are more scientific. I find that assertion humorous.
MVP
Well-Known Member
Funny how you avoid simple answers I ask you, or ignore obvious evidence I provide. But I have a feeling that the more and more questions I ask the more and more frustrated you get as you have no answers. Thats ok, thats why there is reasons god was not proven to exist yet. What is not ok, is you still trying to argue about it and switch your topics in desperation. You talked about atheists kiling people like it was purely because of atheism which was complete BS, I showed you wars were millions of people were killed because of different religion, then you tried to argue that it was hundreds years ago, then when I pointed to Sudana and Lebanon you disappeared as always.
And if you think you being a student is more scientific then me who has doctors and masters degrees and graduated with distinction 18 years ago you are wrong again. As always
Last edited:
MVP
Well-Known Member
Kepler??? Born in December 27, 1571 – died November 15, 1630. Enough said. Dude you still live in middle ages?